hussEyquation
Menu

NBA player comparison

Rich Kelley vs. Tom Boerwinkle: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Tom Boerwinkle ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison
#196Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#124Leads
+4.1Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.7Leads
+3.1Best 5 average impact+3.6Leads
12.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better6.7Leads
+1,350 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,328 pts
1Top-10 impact seasons2Leads

Career Impact Rank places Tom Boerwinkle #124 and Rich Kelley #196. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Rich Kelley had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/rich-kelley/tom-boerwinkle/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedRich Kelley25.867 · No. 196Tom Boerwinkle16.893 · No. 124

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Rich Kelley

25.867 composite · No. 196 all-time

Rich Kelley's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 51978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate12.33350%6.167
Best 5No. 51978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.60030%5.280
Best 10No. 51978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1731983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1811984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate72.10020%14.420

6.167 + 5.280 + 14.420= 25.867

Tom Boerwinkle

16.893 composite · No. 124 all-time

Tom Boerwinkle's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 31970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6.66750%3.333
Best 5No. 31970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9.00030%2.700
Best 10No. 31970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 111975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 141973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 391976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 173.554.30020%10.860

3.333 + 2.700 + 10.860= 16.893

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 173.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#196#124Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finish12.36.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finish17.69.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finish72.154.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#325Better result for this metric.#330
Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.1+4.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average impact+3.5+4.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average impact+3.1+3.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average impact+1.2Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,350 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,328 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons11
Top-ten impact seasons12Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Games814635
Minutes17,71114,387

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
True shooting percentage56.5%Better result for this metric.49.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile56.2%Better result for this metric.50.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Field-goal percentage48.8%Better result for this metric.45.3%
Three-point percentage0.0%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage78.3%Better result for this metric.67.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.3%20.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game2.63.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile26.8%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.3%18.9%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game7.09.0Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.1%Better result for this metric.1.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Rich Kelley and Tom Boerwinkle
MetricRich KelleyTom Boerwinkle
Points per game7.6Better result for this metric.7.2

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Tom Boerwinkle ranks higher in career impact.

Rich KelleyMetricTom Boerwinkle
#196Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#124Leads
+4.1Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.7Leads
+3.1Best 5 average impact+3.6Leads
+1,350 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,328 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Rich KelleyMetricTom Boerwinkle
572Listed-team regular-season wins740Leads
2.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
350-win team seasons8Leads
160-win team seasons8Leads
7Playoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Rich KelleyMetricTom Boerwinkle
6Playoff appearances7Leads
45LeadsPlayoff games35
17Team playoff wins19Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Rich KelleyMetricTom Boerwinkle
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Rich KelleyTom BoerwinklePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.