Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · CHI

Tom Boerwinkle
Tom Boerwinkle stats, teams and career impact
#124 all-timeCareer averages · 7.2 PPG · 9.0 RPG · 3.2 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Center
- Final NBA team
- Chicago Bulls
- Height / weight
- 7 ft 0 in (213 cm) · 265 lb (120 kg)
- Born
- August 23, 1945
- Died
- March 26, 2013 (67 yrs old)
- College
- Tennessee
- NBA seasons
- 10 seasons · 1968–69 to 1977–78
Career summaryTom Boerwinkle was a center who played 10 NBA seasons, from 1968–69 through 1977–78.
- Career PPG
- 7.2
- Career RPG
- 9.0
- Career APG
- 3.2
- #3 in 1970–71
- #124 all-time
Career overview
Why Tom Boerwinkle ranks #124 all time
Tom Boerwinkle ranks #124 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #6.7. His full-career value ranks #330, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.
2 top-ten finishes
635 games · Career Value Rank #330
Head to head
Compare Tom Boerwinkle with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Alvan Adams Defensive and passing centers
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Sam Lacey Defensive and passing centers
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Rich Kelley Defensive and passing centers
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Nate Thurmond Defensive and passing centers
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Kristaps Porziņģis Similar career path
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Bam Adebayo Similar career path
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Brad Daugherty Similar career path
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Dan Issel Similar career path
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Clifford Ray Similar career path
- Tom Boerwinkle vs. Billy Cunningham Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Chicago Bulls
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 45.3%FG%
- Three-point
- —3P%
- Free throw
- 67.5%FT%
635 career games · 14,387 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Tom Boerwinkle stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| 1977–78 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.0 | -3.57 | CHI | 22 | 0 | 10.3 | 46.0% | — | 76.9% | — | -7.5 |
| 1976–77 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 2.3 | +1.50 | CHI | 82 | 0 | 13.0 | 49.1% | — | 54.0% | #39 | 78.0 |
| 1975–76 | 8.8 | 10.7 | 3.8 | +3.42 | CHI | 74 | 0 | 27.6 | 50.0% | — | 66.7% | #11 | 231.4 |
| 1974–75 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 3.4 | +4.41 | CHI | 80 | 0 | 14.7 | 48.7% | — | 76.8% | #6 | 156.5 |
| 1973–74 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 2.0 | +2.58 | CHI | 46 | 0 | 13.1 | 48.7% | — | 70.0% | #14 | 60.3 |
| 1972–73 | 3.8 | 6.8 | 5.0 | -1.37 | CHI | 8 | 0 | 22.0 | 37.5% | — | 60.0% | — | 2.4 |
| 1971–72 | 7.0 | 11.2 | 3.5 | +2.91 | CHI | 80 | 0 | 25.3 | 43.8% | — | 65.6% | #11 | 224.6 |
| 1970–71 | 10.8 | 13.8 | 4.8 | +4.65 | CHI | 82 | 0 | 28.9 | 48.5% | — | 72.4% | #3 | 360.5 |
| 1969–70 | 10.4 | 12.5 | 2.8 | +1.11 | CHI | 81 | 0 | 28.8 | 44.9% | — | 66.4% | #27 | 176.4 |
| 1968–69 | 9.8 | 11.1 | 2.2 | -1.19 | CHI | 80 | 0 | 29.6 | 38.3% | — | 65.3% | #85 | 45.0 |
| Career | 7.2 | 9.0 | 3.2 | — | CHI | 635 | — | 22.7 | 45.3% | — | 67.5% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
Film evidence
Tom Boerwinkle highlights
Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.
Remembering Tom Boerwinkle
This brief official remembrance supplies scarce footage and historical context for Boerwinkle's rebounding, passing and interior presence in Chicago.
What these measures mean
- Era-centered box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average.
- Impact Rate Rank
- The player's place among qualified players in one season.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
16.9 composite · lower is better
9.0 average league finish
1,328 total value
Career standing
How Tom Boerwinkle ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 173.5
- Qualified seasons
- 8
- All-time rank
- #124
Every season
Tom Boerwinkle advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| 1977–78Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 32 | 22 | 227 | -3.57 | — | — | -7.5 | — | Limited |
| 1976–77Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 31 | 82 | 1,070 | +1.50 | 84.4 | #39 | 78.0 | 59th | Broad |
| 1975–76Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 30 | 74 | 2,045 | +3.42 | 94.7 | #11 | 231.4 | 87th | Broad |
| 1974–75Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 29 | 80 | 1,175 | +4.41 | 97.3 | #6 | 156.5 | 79th | Broad |
| 1973–74Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 28 | 46 | 602 | +2.58 | 92.6 | #14 | 60.3 | 51st | Standard |
| 1972–73Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 27 | 8 | 176 | -1.37 | — | — | 2.4 | — | Modeled |
| 1971–72Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 26 | 80 | 2,022 | +2.91 | 93.9 | #11 | 224.6 | 83rd | Modeled |
| 1970–71Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 25 | 82 | 2,370 | +4.65 | 98.8 | #3 | 360.5 | 96th | Modeled |
| 1969–70Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 24 | 81 | 2,335 | +1.11 | 81.6 | #27 | 176.4 | 80th | Modeled |
| 1968–69Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 23 | 80 | 2,365 | -1.19 | 36.8 | #85 | 45.0 | 44th | Modeled |
Career movement
Tom Boerwinkle's career impact by season
Peak +4.65 in 1970–71 · 10 seasons · 14,387 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. The vertical scale adapts to this player's range and always includes zero.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Tom Boerwinkle | Kristaps Porziņģis |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.2 | 1.4 |
| 2 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 4.7 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| 5 | -1.4 | 1.8 |
| 6 | 2.6 | 4.0 |
| 7 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| 8 | 3.4 | 3.6 |
| 9 | 1.5 | 4.0 |
| 10 | -3.6 | 2.6 |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Tom Boerwinkle
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Kristaps Porziņģis
91career similarity score
93/100 closest-season score · 1970–71 ↔ 2022–23C · All-Time Career #329Bam Adebayo
91career similarity score
93/100 closest-season score · 1970–71 ↔ 2020–21C · All-Time Career #273Brad Daugherty
89career similarity score
95/100 closest-season score · 1970–71 ↔ 1991–92Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →