Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · DET / GSW / IND / ORL / SAC / SAS / TOR
Cory Joseph
Cory Joseph stats, teams and career impact
#2610 all-timeCareer averages · 6.7 PPG · 2.4 RPG · 2.9 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Point guard
- Final NBA team
- Orlando Magic
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 2 in (188 cm) · 200 lb (91 kg)
- Born
- August 20, 1991 (35 yrs old)
- College
- Texas
- NBA seasons
- 14 seasons · 2011–12 to 2024–25
Career summaryCory Joseph was a point guard who played 14 NBA seasons, from 2011–12 through 2024–25.
- Career PPG
- 6.7
- Career RPG
- 2.4
- Career APG
- 2.9
- #100 in 2014–15
- #2610 all-time
Best-Season Impact Rank
Career Impact Rank
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
Career overview
Why Cory Joseph ranks #2610 all time
Cory Joseph ranks #2610 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #124.3. His full-career value ranks #1030, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.
450+ minutes required per season
866 games · Career Value Rank #1030
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- San Antonio Spurs, Toronto Raptors, Indiana Pacers, Sacramento Kings, Detroit Pistons, Golden State Warriors, and Orlando Magic
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 44.0%FG%
- Three-point
- 35.0%3P%
- Free throw
- 78.6%FT%
866 career games · 18,296 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Cory Joseph stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| 2024–25 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | -0.58 | ORL | 50 | 16 | 12.2 | 40.3% | 36.4% | 77.8% | #213 | 17.4 |
| 2023–24 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 | -5.65 | GSW | 26 | 0 | 11.4 | 35.9% | 31.0% | 57.1% | — | -22.3 |
| 2022–23 | 6.9 | 1.7 | 3.5 | -0.87 | DET | 62 | 2 | 19.8 | 42.7% | 38.9% | 79.2% | #206 | 28.6 |
| 2021–22 | 8.0 | 2.7 | 3.6 | -1.10 | DET | 65 | 39 | 24.6 | 44.5% | 41.4% | 88.5% | #236 | 29.7 |
| 2020–21 | 8.2 | 2.5 | 3.4 | -1.06 | DET/SAC | 63 | 13 | 23.0 | 46.9% | 34.1% | 81.8% | #231 | 28.1 |
| 2019–20 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 3.5 | -2.10 | SAC | 72 | 26 | 24.4 | 41.5% | 35.2% | 85.7% | #270 | -3.8 |
| 2018–19 | 6.5 | 3.4 | 3.9 | -0.35 | IND | 82 | 9 | 25.2 | 41.2% | 32.2% | 69.8% | #165 | 69.7 |
| 2017–18 | 7.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 | -1.56 | IND | 82 | 17 | 27.0 | 42.4% | 35.3% | 74.5% | #250 | 19.4 |
| 2016–17 | 9.3 | 2.9 | 3.3 | -2.00 | TOR | 80 | 22 | 25.0 | 45.2% | 35.6% | 77.0% | #254 | -0.0 |
| 2015–16 | 8.5 | 2.6 | 3.1 | -1.93 | TOR | 80 | 4 | 25.6 | 43.9% | 27.3% | 76.4% | #264 | 2.8 |
| 2014–15 | 6.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 | +0.83 | SAS | 79 | 14 | 18.3 | 50.4% | 36.4% | 73.4% | #100 | 79.9 |
| 2013–14 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | +0.47 | SAS | 68 | 19 | 13.8 | 47.5% | 31.6% | 82.3% | #108 | 45.7 |
| 2012–13 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 | -0.64 | SAS | 28 | 9 | 13.9 | 46.4% | 28.6% | 85.7% | — | 10.4 |
| 2011–12 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | -6.07 | SAS | 29 | 1 | 9.2 | 31.4% | 20.0% | 64.7% | — | -20.9 |
| Career | 6.7 | 2.4 | 2.9 | — | DET/GSW/IND/ORL/SAC/SAS/TOR | 866 | — | 21.1 | 44.0% | 35.0% | 78.6% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Era-centered box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average.
- Impact Rate Rank
- The player's place among qualified players in one season.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
161.8 composite · lower is better
158.4 average league finish
285 total value
Career standing
How Cory Joseph ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Career Composite Score161.8
Equal average of Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 161.8
- Qualified seasons
- 11
- All-time rank
- #2610
Strongest seasons
Every season
Cory Joseph advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| 2024–25 | ORL | 33 | 50 | 612 | -0.58 | 45.4 | #213 | 17.4 | 35th | Standard |
| 2023–24 | GSW | 32 | 26 | 296 | -5.65 | — | — | -22.3 | — | Limited |
| 2022–23 | DET | 31 | 62 | 1,227 | -0.87 | 45.8 | #206 | 28.6 | 47th | Broad |
| 2021–22 | DET | 30 | 65 | 1,600 | -1.10 | 38.8 | #236 | 29.7 | 42nd | Broad |
| 2020–21 | DET/SAC | 29 | 63 | 1,446 | -1.06 | 37.5 | #231 | 28.1 | 42nd | Broad |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | SAC | 28 | 72 | 1,759 | -2.10 | 23.6 | #270 | -3.8 | 22nd | Broad |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 27 | 82 | 2,063 | -0.35 | 55.4 | #165 | 69.7 | 64th | Broad |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 26 | 82 | 2,210 | -1.56 | 31.0 | #250 | 19.4 | 38th | Broad |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 25 | 80 | 2,003 | -2.00 | 30.3 | #254 | -0.0 | 30th | Broad |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 24 | 80 | 2,046 | -1.93 | 27.5 | #264 | 2.8 | 29th | Broad |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 23 | 79 | 1,444 | +0.83 | 73.2 | #100 | 79.9 | 69th | Broad |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 22 | 68 | 936 | +0.47 | 69.0 | #108 | 45.7 | 52nd | Standard |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 21 | 28 | 388 | -0.64 | — | — | 10.4 | — | Limited |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 20 | 29 | 266 | -6.07 | — | — | -20.9 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Cory Joseph's career impact by season
Peak +0.83 in 2014–15 · 14 seasons · 18,296 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. The vertical scale adapts to this player's range and always includes zero.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Cory JosephIsh Smith
| NBA season | Cory Joseph | Ish Smith |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -6.1 | -4.6 |
| 2 | -0.6 | -2.8 |
| 3 | 0.5 | -2.9 |
| 4 | 0.8 | -2.3 |
| 5 | -1.9 | -1.2 |
| 6 | -2.0 | -0.3 |
| 7 | -1.6 | 0.4 |
| 8 | -0.3 | 0.1 |
| 9 | -2.1 | -2.1 |
| 10 | -1.1 | -0.9 |
| 11 | -1.1 | -1.4 |
| 12 | -0.9 | -1.6 |
| 13 | -5.6 | -6.5 |
| 14 | -0.6 | -5.2 |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Cory Joseph
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
PG · All-Time Career #2750
Ish Smith
93career similarity score
85/100 closest-season score · 2014–15 ↔ 2016–17PG · All-Time Career #2604Steve Blake
92career similarity score
91/100 closest-season score · 2014–15 ↔ 2005–06PG · All-Time Career #2492Shaun Livingston
92career similarity score
93/100 closest-season score · 2014–15 ↔ 2006–07Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →