Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · BRK
Danny Wolf
Danny Wolf stats, teams and career impact
#3071 all-timeCareer averages · 8.9 PPG · 4.9 RPG · 2.2 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Power forward
- 2025–26 team
- Brooklyn Nets
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 11 in (211 cm) · 250 lb (113 kg)
- Born
- May 5, 2004 (22 yrs old)
- College
- Yale, Michigan
- NBA seasons
- 1 season · 2025–26 to 2025–26
Selected season2025–26 · BRK · 57 games · 1,187 minutes
- PPG
- 8.9
- RPG
- 4.9
- APG
- 2.2
- #262 of 395 57 games · 1,187 minutes
- 34th percentile
Impact Rate Rank
Season Value percentile
Career overview
Why Danny Wolf currently ranks #3071 all time
Danny Wolf ranks #3071 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #351.3. His full-career value already ranks #1789 after 1 seasons, and his all-time position can still rise.
450+ minutes required per season
57 games · Career Value Rank #1789
Head to head
Compare Danny Wolf with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.
- Danny Wolf vs. Stromile Swift Similar career path
- Danny Wolf vs. Dick Ricketts Similar career path
- Danny Wolf vs. Otis Thorpe Similar career path
- Danny Wolf vs. Adam Keefe Similar career path
- Danny Wolf vs. Michael Smith Similar career path
- Danny Wolf vs. Ed Davis Similar career path
- Danny Wolf vs. Moussa Cisse Same-era comparison
- Danny Wolf vs. Will Richard Same-era comparison
- Danny Wolf vs. Asa Newell Same-era comparison
- Danny Wolf vs. Rasheer Fleming Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Brooklyn Nets
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 40.5%FG%
- Three-point
- 32.2%3P%
- Free throw
- 77.1%FT%
57 career games · 1,187 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Danny Wolf stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 8.9 | 4.9 | 2.2 | -0.99 | BRK | 57 | 15 | 20.8 | 40.5% | 32.2% | 77.1% | #262 | -0.1 |
| Career | 8.9 | 4.9 | 2.2 | — | BRK | 57 | — | 20.8 | 40.5% | 32.2% | 77.1% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
RolePF · Age 21
Availability57 games · 15 starts
Workload20.8 MPG · 1,187 minutes
Relative impactBRK #5 of 12 · PF #54 of 76
UpdatedOct 6, 2026
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
57 games · 1,187 minutes · 24.8 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank
-0.1 total value · 395 qualified players
Career Composite 362.9 · lower is better · 1 season
Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #82–#360
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
- Impact estimate
- The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Danny Wolf ranked 262nd in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 237th, led by strong passing despite below-average scoring efficiency. Over about 1,200 minutes, he finished in the 34th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Danny Wolf's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
0–100 score · higher is better
24.8 / 100Season Value
34
-0.1Scoring role
Usage
65
20.6%True shooting
11
52.1%3-point attempt rate
61
48.0%Free-throw rate
54
24.8%Creation and control
Assist rate
65
17.1%Turnover avoidance
40
13.0%Possession stats
Rebound rate
83
13.8%Steal rate
22
1.2%Block rate
76
2.5%Lineup signal
Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
2
−2.61 pts/100Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
72
+0.81 pts/100Workload
Minutes per game
38
20.8Games played
39
57Total minutes
41
1,187A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Ranking editions
How the ranking changed
Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.
20.9 Impact Rate · 1,187 MP
Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026
First snapshot24.8 Impact Rate · 1,187 MP
Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026
↑18 since priorEvery season
Danny Wolf advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | BRK | 21 | 57 | 1,187 | -0.99 | 24.8 | #262 | -0.1 | 34th | Standard |
Career movement
Danny Wolf's box impact by season
Peak box impact -0.99 points per 100 possessions in 2025–26 · 1 season · 1,187 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload
Early-career comparison
Compare the first 1 season
Both players are limited to their first 1 season. Later seasons never affect the selection or score, and the result is not a career prediction.
Danny WolfStromile Swift
| NBA season | Danny Wolf | Stromile Swift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.0 | -1.3 |
NBA season number · first 1 season only
Similar starts
Players with starts similar to Danny Wolf
The start-similarity percentile compares era-relative impact, season-relative workload, trajectory, debut age, and role across exactly 1 season and 2,435 eligible starts. Higher means closer; it is not a probability or forecast.
PF · All-Time Career #1433
Stromile Swift
99.9start similarity percentile
Impact: very closeWorkload: very closeAge: very closeRole: very close
High evidence · first 1 seasonClosest early-season pairing · 2025–26 ↔ 2000–01PF · All-Time Career #601Dick Ricketts
99.8start similarity percentile
Impact: very closeWorkload: very closeAge: very closeRole: very close
Medium evidence · first 1 seasonClosest early-season pairing · 2025–26 ↔ 1955–56PF · All-Time Career #561Otis Thorpe
99.8start similarity percentile
Impact: very closeWorkload: very closeAge: very closeRole: very close
High evidence · first 1 seasonClosest early-season pairing · 2025–26 ↔ 1984–85Why this rank?
Why Danny Wolf ranks #262
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.
Prior rank #237
Current total -1.05 ±1.0
Split model · O -2.61 · D +0.81 = -1.80
Maximum ±1.25
Points per 100 possessions · higher is better
Higher is better · 24.8 before the MPG adjustment · rank #262
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
Ranking certaintyWide
The model's 80% impact interval is -2.25 to +2.26. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 1%
- Top 50 chance
- 4%
- Top 100 chance
- 14%
- 80% rank range
- #82–#360
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →