138.8 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · HOU / MEM / NJN / PHO / VAN
Stromile Swift
Stromile Swift advanced stats and career rankings
144.2 average league finish
152 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Stromile Swift ranks #2338 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #113.3. His full-career value ranks #1294, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Stromile Swift's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Stromile Swift ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite138.8
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 138.8
- Qualified seasons
- 8
- All-time rank
- #2338
Strongest seasons
Every season
Stromile Swift advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | NJN/PHO | 29 | 19 | 185 | -9.88 | — | — | -28.5 | — | Limited |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | MEM/NJN | 28 | 56 | 844 | -2.29 | 23.6 | #254 | -4.8 | 24th | Established |
| 2006–07Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 27 | 54 | 1,029 | -4.18 | 5.7 | #316 | -43.7 | 4th | Strong |
| 2005–06Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 26 | 66 | 1,344 | -2.47 | 24.4 | #249 | -11.6 | 23rd | Strong |
| 2004–05Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 25 | 60 | 1,279 | -1.12 | 43.7 | #194 | 20.6 | 42nd | Strong |
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 24 | 77 | 1,528 | +0.56 | 71.6 | #95 | 74.6 | 65th | Strong |
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 23 | 67 | 1,478 | -0.03 | 63.5 | #117 | 56.2 | 59th | Strong |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 22 | 68 | 1,805 | +0.07 | 60.7 | #128 | 70.8 | 63rd | Strong |
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | VAN | 21 | 80 | 1,312 | -1.26 | 43.1 | #187 | 18.6 | 44th | Strong |
Career movement
Stromile Swift's career impact by season
Peak +0.56 in 2003–04 · 9 seasons · 10,804 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Stromile SwiftMaxi Kleber
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Stromile Swift
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #2815
Maxi Kleber
94%career match
92% season match · 2003–04 ↔ 2017–18PF · All-Time Career #662Luke Jackson
92%career match
92% season match · 2003–04 ↔ 1965–66PF · All-Time Career #1949Jeff Cook
92%career match
89% season match · 2003–04 ↔ 1982–83PF · All-Time Career #2421Dario Šarić
92%career match
94% season match · 2003–04 ↔ 2019–20PF · All-Time Career #2251Trevor Booker
92%career match
95% season match · 2003–04 ↔ 2011–12PF · All-Time Career #1187Toby Kimball
92%career match
91% season match · 2003–04 ↔ 1968–69Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →