74.4 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · CLE / LAC / POR
Darnell Valentine
Darnell Valentine advanced stats and career rankings
68.4 average league finish
605 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Darnell Valentine ranks #1289 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #53.3. His full-career value ranks #687, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Darnell Valentine's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Darnell Valentine ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite74.4
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 74.4
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #1289
Strongest seasons
Every season
Darnell Valentine advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | CLE | 31 | 65 | 1,841 | +0.03 | 62.2 | #111 | 73.9 | 64th | Strong |
| 1988–89Historical Defense Estimate | CLE | 29 | 77 | 1,086 | -1.38 | 39.2 | #161 | 13.7 | 37th | Strong |
| 1987–88Historical Defense Estimate | LAC | 28 | 79 | 1,636 | +1.24 | 79.6 | #52 | 111.5 | 75th | Strong |
| 1986–87Historical Defense Estimate | LAC | 27 | 65 | 1,759 | +0.68 | 73.4 | #69 | 100.9 | 70th | Strong |
| 1985–86Historical Defense Estimate | LAC/POR | 26 | 62 | 1,217 | -1.75 | 29.5 | #180 | 6.5 | 30th | Strong |
| 1984–85Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 25 | 75 | 2,278 | +0.56 | 72.3 | #71 | 125.6 | 75th | Strong |
| 1983–84Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 24 | 68 | 1,893 | -0.71 | 48.4 | #129 | 51.4 | 49th | Strong |
| 1982–83Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 23 | 47 | 1,298 | +1.93 | 85.0 | #39 | 107.2 | 69th | Strong |
| 1981–82Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 22 | 82 | 1,387 | -1.52 | 29.9 | #179 | 13.8 | 34th | Strong |
Career movement
Darnell Valentine's career impact by season
Peak +1.93 in 1982–83 · 9 seasons · 14,395 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
—’90
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Darnell ValentineTony Delk
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Darnell Valentine
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PG · All-Time Career #1756
Tony Delk
94%career match
92% season match · 1982–83 ↔ 1996–97PG · All-Time Career #537Clem Haskins
93%career match
88% season match · 1982–83 ↔ 1967–68PG · All-Time Career #1873B.J. Armstrong
93%career match
87% season match · 1982–83 ↔ 1990–91PG · All-Time Career #1162Quinn Buckner
92%career match
92% season match · 1982–83 ↔ 1979–80PG · All-Time Career #2019Damon Jones
92%career match
92% season match · 1982–83 ↔ 2000–01PG · All-Time Career #2015Ramon Sessions
92%career match
90% season match · 1982–83 ↔ 2011–12Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →