100.6 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · CHI / GSW / KCK / PHO / SAS
Ed Nealy
Ed Nealy advanced stats and career rankings
108.8 average league finish
153 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Ed Nealy ranks #1829 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #98.7. His full-career value ranks #1287, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Ed Nealy's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Ed Nealy ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite100.6
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 100.6
- Qualified seasons
- 7
- All-time rank
- #1829
Strongest seasons
Every season
Ed Nealy advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | CHI/GSW | 32 | 41 | 308 | -3.83 | — | — | -11.5 | — | Limited |
| 1991–92Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 31 | 52 | 505 | +0.67 | 70.2 | #87 | 27.9 | 48th | Established |
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 30 | 55 | 573 | +0.13 | 63.9 | #106 | 25.7 | 42nd | Established |
| 1989–90Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 29 | 46 | 503 | -1.22 | 42.5 | #166 | 7.9 | 36th | Established |
| 1988–89Historical Defense Estimate | CHI/PHO | 28 | 43 | 258 | -5.26 | — | — | -17.8 | — | Limited |
| 1987–88Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 27 | 68 | 837 | -1.45 | 37.6 | #157 | 10.1 | 34th | Established |
| 1986–87Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 26 | 60 | 980 | -0.29 | 60.2 | #103 | 35.6 | 48th | Established |
| 1984–85Historical Defense Estimate | KCK | 24 | 22 | 225 | -4.58 | — | — | -12.6 | — | Limited |
| 1983–84Historical Defense Estimate | KCK | 23 | 71 | 960 | -0.86 | 46.0 | #135 | 23.4 | 40th | Established |
| 1982–83Historical Defense Estimate | KCK | 22 | 82 | 1,643 | -0.22 | 55.7 | #113 | 64.8 | 57th | Strong |
Career movement
Ed Nealy's career impact by season
Peak +0.67 in 1991–92 · 10 seasons · 6,792 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
—’86
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Ed NealyJonas Jerebko
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Ed Nealy
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #2462
Jonas Jerebko
89%career match
88% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2018–19SF · All-Time Career #2400Omri Casspi
89%career match
93% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2018–19SF · All-Time Career #2433Mickaël Piétrus
89%career match
80% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2007–08PF · All-Time Career #2713Chris Wilcox
88%career match
91% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2012–13PF · All-Time Career #2815Maxi Kleber
88%career match
85% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2020–21PF · All-Time Career #2211Gary Trent
88%career match
85% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2002–03Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →