31.0 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · GSW / MIL / SAS
Paul Pressey
Paul Pressey advanced stats and career rankings
19.2 average league finish
1,756 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Paul Pressey ranks #268 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #14.3. His full-career value ranks #224, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Paul Pressey's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Paul Pressey ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 31.0
- Qualified seasons
- 10
- All-time rank
- #268
Every season
Paul Pressey advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 34 | 18 | 268 | -4.94 | — | — | -16.3 | — | Limited |
| 1991–92Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 33 | 56 | 759 | -2.23 | 25.3 | #217 | -3.5 | 26th | Established |
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 32 | 70 | 1,683 | -0.43 | 55.0 | #132 | 54.3 | 54th | Strong |
| 1989–90Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 31 | 57 | 1,400 | +1.84 | 85.4 | #43 | 109.9 | 71st | Strong |
| 1988–89Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 30 | 67 | 2,170 | +1.90 | 85.2 | #40 | 173.9 | 83rd | Strong |
| 1987–88Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 29 | 75 | 2,484 | +3.21 | 93.2 | #18 | 263.3 | 90th | Strong |
| 1986–87Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 28 | 61 | 2,057 | +3.19 | 92.6 | #20 | 223.1 | 90th | Strong |
| 1985–86Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 27 | 80 | 2,704 | +4.73 | 97.2 | #8 | 387.3 | 98th | Strong |
| 1984–85Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 26 | 80 | 2,876 | +3.57 | 93.7 | #17 | 332.5 | 96th | Strong |
| 1983–84Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 25 | 81 | 1,730 | +1.92 | 87.1 | #33 | 136.9 | 77th | Strong |
| 1982–83Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 24 | 79 | 1,528 | +0.98 | 74.3 | #66 | 94.7 | 66th | Strong |
Career movement
Paul Pressey's career impact by season
Peak +4.73 in 1985–86 · 11 seasons · 19,659 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Paul Pressey
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
Tom Gola
93%career match
91% season match · 1985–86 ↔ 1958–59SF · All-Time Career #65Cliff Hagan
92%career match
97% season match · 1985–86 ↔ 1958–59SG · All-Time Career #201George Gervin
92%career match
94% season match · 1985–86 ↔ 1978–79PG · All-Time Career #300John Wall
91%career match
87% season match · 1985–86 ↔ 2016–17PG · All-Time Career #350Deron Williams
91%career match
87% season match · 1985–86 ↔ 2010–11SG · All-Time Career #35Sam Jones
90%career match
87% season match · 1985–86 ↔ 1962–63Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →