hussEyquation
Explore rankings

Player profile · CLE / MIL / PHI

Pete Nance

Pete Nance advanced stats and career rankings

RolePF · Age 25
Availability47 games · 6 starts
Workload15.7 MPG · 737 minutes
Relative impactMIL #7 of 13 · PF #40 of 76
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
EvidenceEstablished

Low ranking precision · Likely rank #82–#351

Bottom line · 2025–26

In 2025–26, Pete Nance ranked 221st in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 233rd, led by strong scoring efficiency. With only about 700 minutes, he finished in the 40th percentile for total season value.

2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Pete Nance's impact

395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with

Overall value

Impact Rate
44
33.6
Season Value
40
4.4

Scoring role

Usage
13
13.5%
True shooting
90
63.9%
3-point attempt rate
85
61.3%
Free-throw rate
1
5.7%

Creation and control

Assist rate
25
9.2%
Turnover avoidance
57
11.6%

Possession stats

Rebound rate
56
9.6%
Steal rate
5
0.9%
Block rate
65
1.9%

Lineup signal

Offensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
68
+0.86
Defensive lineup impact387-player lineup pool
29
−0.74

Workload

Minutes per game
16
15.7
Games played
19
47
Total minutes
15
737

Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.

Every season

Pete Nance advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

SeasonTeamAgeGPMPEra-centered box impactImpact RateRate rankSeason ValueValue percentileEvidence
2025–26live modelMIL2547737-0.9433.6#2214.440thEstablished
2024–25MIL/PHI2413138-7.25-14.9Limited
2023–24CLE23827-13.71-6.4Limited

Career movement

Pete Nance's career impact by season

Peak -0.94 in 2025–26 · 3 seasons · 902 minutes

The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.

Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload

Early-career comparison

Compare the first 3 seasons

Only the first 3 NBA seasons are compared, so this is a similarity of starts—not a prediction of the full career.

Pete NanceByron Mullens

NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15

Similar starts

Players with starts similar to Pete Nance

The score compares the first 3 seasons by impact, workload, position, and trajectory. It does not claim the careers will finish alike.

Why this rank?

Why Pete Nance ranks #221

The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.

01 · Box-score prior+0.30

Prior rank #233

02 · Multi-season RAPM+0.31

Current total +0.36 ±0.9
Split model · O +0.86 · D -0.74 = +0.11

03 · Bounded correction+0.02

Maximum ±0.75

04 · Model estimate+0.32

Before the within-season scale

05 · MPG-adjusted rate33.6

35.3 unadjusted · 84% role factor · rank #221

RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.

What the point estimate meansLow precision

The model's 80% impact interval is -1.98 to +2.54. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.

Top 25 chance
0%
Top 50 chance
3%
Top 100 chance
15%
80% rank range
#82#351
How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →