hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · ATL / KCK / SEA

Tom Burleson

Tom Burleson stats, teams and career impact

#819 all-timeCareer averages · 9.4 PPG · 6.3 RPG · 1.3 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Center
Final NBA team
Atlanta Hawks
Height / weight
7 ft 2 in (218 cm) · 225 lb (102 kg)
Born
February 24, 1952 (74 yrs old)
College
NC State
NBA seasons
7 seasons · 1974–75 to 1980–81

Career summaryTom Burleson was a center who played 7 NBA seasons, from 1974–75 through 1980–81.

Career PPG
9.4
Career RPG
6.3
Career APG
1.3
Best-Season Impact Rank
#32 in 1975–76
Career Impact Rank
#819 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Tom Burleson ranks #819 all time

Tom Burleson ranks #819 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #55.3. His full-career value ranks #815 across 7 seasons. Career Impact Rank averages his best three, five, and ten season ranks, with the most weight on his peak.

Peak#32 in 1975–76

Best league finish

Sustained excellence5 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth7 seasons

446 games · Career Value Rank #815

Head to head

Compare Tom Burleson with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Tom Burleson vs. Willie Cauley-Stein Similar career path
  2. Tom Burleson vs. Dave Robisch Similar career path
  3. Tom Burleson vs. Tiago Splitter Similar career path
  4. Tom Burleson vs. Paul Griffin Similar career path
  5. Tom Burleson vs. Lew Hitch Similar career path
  6. Tom Burleson vs. Swen Nater Similar career path
  7. Tom Burleson vs. Doug Collins Same-era comparison
  8. Tom Burleson vs. Mike Bantom Same-era comparison
  9. Tom Burleson vs. John Shumate Same-era comparison
  10. Tom Burleson vs. Allan Bristow Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Seattle SuperSonics, Kansas City Kings, and Atlanta Hawks

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
44.5%FG%
Three-point
0.0%3P%
Free throw
72.6%FT%

446 career games · 9,425 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Tom Burleson stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
1980–813.33.00.4-6.25ATL31011.741.4%—48.8%—-32.0
1979–802.61.90.5-6.34KCK3707.434.6%0.0%57.5%—-25.4
1978–797.85.00.9-0.83KCK56016.645.9%—71.6%#13024.3
1977–788.66.31.7+0.49KCK76020.143.4%—79.4%#6885.6
1976–779.76.71.1+0.56SEA828222.044.2%—73.1%#75102.9
1975–7615.69.02.2+1.62SEA828232.348.1%—75.0%#32215.0
1974–7510.17.01.4+0.36SEA82023.041.7%—68.7%#6698.1
Career9.46.31.3—ATL/KCK/SEA446—21.144.5%0.0%72.6%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#738

74.2 average league finish

Career Value Rank#815

469 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Tom Burleson ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score80.2

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
229.0
Qualified seasons
5
All-time rank
#819
Strongest seasons

Every season

Tom Burleson advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
1980–81Historical Defense EstimateATL2831363-6.25——-32.0—Limited
1979–80Historical Defense EstimateKCK2737272-6.34——-25.4—Limited
1978–79Historical Defense EstimateKCK2656927-0.8343.2#13024.336thStandard
1977–78Historical Defense EstimateKCK25761,525+0.4971.6#6885.661stBroad
1976–77Historical Defense EstimateSEA24821,803+0.5669.5#75102.966thBroad
1975–76Historical Defense EstimateSEA23822,647+1.6283.5#32215.085thBroad
1974–75Historical Defense EstimateSEA22821,888+0.3665.2#6698.165thBroad

Career movement

Tom Burleson's box impact by season

Peak box impact +1.62 points per 100 possessions in 1975–76 · 7 seasons · 9,425 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Tom BurlesonWillie Cauley-Stein
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Tom Burleson and Willie Cauley-Stein era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonTom BurlesonWillie Cauley-Stein
10.4-0.8
21.6-0.9
30.60.9
40.51.2
5-0.81.5
6-6.3-1.7
7-6.3-6.6

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Tom Burleson

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →