Menu
Last updated Oct 6, 2026
NBA impact data · 1950–51 to present
1953–54 NBA Player Rankings
Impact Rate and Season Value rankings for the 1953–54 regular season—the NBA season ending in 1954.
Season ending 1954
Who ranks No. 1 in 1953–54?
Ed Macauley ranks No. 1 in hussEyquation Impact Rate for the 1953–54 regular season. This is a model-based impact ranking, not the NBA scoring-leader or standings table. The top ten below compare per-possession impact within this season across 83 qualified players.
The 1953–54 NBA season ended in 1954. If you mean the season that began in 1954, see 1954–55.
- #1Ed MacauleyBOS100.0
- #2Dolph SchayesSYR98.8
- #3Neil JohnstonPHW97.6
- #4Bob CousyBOS96.3
- #5Bobby WanzerROC95.1
- #6George MikanMNL93.9
- #7Harry GallatinNYK92.7
- #8Billy KenvilleSYR91.5
- #9George YardleyFTW90.2
- #10Jim PollardMNL89.0
1953–54 Impact Rate rankings
A backtested impact estimate from the statistics recorded in that era, with uncertainty ranges.
Swipe for more player stats →
| Compare | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100.0 | BOS | C | 25 | 71 | — | 39.3 | 2,792 | ||
| 2 | 98.8 | SYR | C | 25 | 72 | — | 36.9 | 2,655 | ||
| 3 | 97.6 | PHW | C | 24 | 72 | — | 45.8 | 3,296 | ||
| 4 | 96.3 | BOS | PG | 25 | 72 | — | 39.7 | 2,857 | ||
| 5 | 95.1 | ROC | SG | 32 | 72 | — | 35.3 | 2,538 | ||
| 6 | 93.9 | MNL | C | 29 | 72 | — | 32.8 | 2,362 | ||
| 7 | 92.7 | NYK | PF | 26 | 72 | — | 37.4 | 2,690 | ||
| 8 | 91.5 | SYR | PG | 23 | 72 | — | 19.5 | 1,405 | ||
| 9 | 90.2 | FTW | SF | 25 | 63 | — | 23.6 | 1,489 | ||
| 10 | 89.0 | MNL | SF | 31 | 71 | — | 35.0 | 2,483 | ||
| 11 | 87.8 | SYR | SG | 26 | 71 | — | 38.4 | 2,727 | ||
| 12 | 86.6 | BOS | SG | 27 | 72 | — | 34.3 | 2,467 | ||
| 13 | 85.4 | ROC | PF | 29 | 71 | — | 33.5 | 2,377 | ||
| 14 | 84.1 | FTW | C | 25 | 72 | — | 37.4 | 2,693 | ||
| 15 | 82.9 | FTW | PF | 25 | 72 | — | 40.8 | 2,934 | ||
| 16 | 82 | FTW | SF | 22 | 32 | — | 29.9 | 958 | ||
| 17 | 80.5 | BLB | PG | 28 | 72 | — | 34.8 | 2,505 | ||
| 18 | 79.3 | MLH | PF | 24 | 72 | — | 34.1 | 2,452 | ||
| 19 | 78.0 | NYK | PG | 28 | 68 | — | 34.5 | 2,343 | ||
| 20 | 76.8 | SYR | PG | 25 | 72 | — | 32.9 | 2,370 | ||
| 21 | 75.6 | FTW | PG | 31 | 71 | — | 38.1 | 2,705 | ||
| 22 | 74.4 | PHW | PG | 25 | 71 | — | 37.3 | 2,648 | ||
| 23 | 73.2 | ROC | PG | 34 | 72 | — | 29.7 | 2,137 | ||
| 24 | 72.0 | NYK | SG | 26 | 72 | — | 33.0 | 2,373 | ||
| 25 | 70.7 | ROC | PG | 25 | 71 | — | 26.6 | 1,891 | ||
| 26 | 69.5 | ROC | C | 29 | 72 | — | 33.1 | 2,385 | ||
| 27 | 68.3 | MLH | PF | 31 | 69 | — | 31.4 | 2,170 | ||
| 28 | 67.1 | BLB | C | 22 | 72 | — | 23.0 | 1,657 | ||
| 29 | 65.9 | ROC | SF | 29 | 72 | — | 22.7 | 1,633 | ||
| 30 | 64.6 | MNL | PF | 25 | 72 | — | 31.2 | 2,247 | ||
| 31 | 63.4 | PHW | PF | 24 | 71 | — | 38.9 | 2,759 | ||
| 32 | 62.2 | BOS | SG | 27 | 68 | — | 21.3 | 1,451 | ||
| 33 | 61.0 | NYK | PF | 31 | 72 | — | 30.3 | 2,179 | ||
| 34 | 59.8 | SYR | SF | 25 | 72 | — | 30.6 | 2,206 | ||
| 35 | 58.5 | PHW | PG | 25 | 68 | — | 23.0 | 1,562 | ||
| 36 | 57.3 | MLH | SF | 26 | 72 | — | 32.9 | 2,370 | ||
| 37 | 56.1 | SYR | PF | 25 | 70 | — | 30.9 | 2,164 | ||
| 38 | 54.9 | BLB | C | 23 | 72 | — | 37.1 | 2,672 | ||
| 39 | 53.7 | PHW | SG | 26 | 64 | — | 32.3 | 2,067 | ||
| 40 | 52.4 | ROC | SF | 26 | 70 | — | 23.6 | 1,654 | ||
| 41 | 51.2 | FTW / MLH | C | 26 | 68 | — | 23.2 | 1,576 | ||
| 42 | 50.0 | PHW | SF | 23 | 71 | — | 25.3 | 1,795 | ||
| 43 | 48.8 | FTW / NYK | SF | 28 | 67 | — | 22.6 | 1,515 | ||
| 44 | 47.6 | MNL | C | 24 | 72 | — | 17.4 | 1,255 | ||
| 45 | 46.3 | MNL | SG | 27 | 71 | — | 26.4 | 1,877 | ||
| 46 | 45.1 | BLB / FTW / MLH | SG | 28 | 65 | — | 28.9 | 1,881 | ||
| 47 | 43.9 | BOS | SF | 26 | 71 | — | 26.7 | 1,898 | ||
| 48 | 42.7 | MLH | SF | 23 | 69 | — | 21.7 | 1,496 | ||
| 49 | 41.5 | BLB / MLH | PF | 21 | 70 | — | 28.1 | 1,970 | ||
| 50 | 40 | FTW | SG | 30 | 64 | — | 15.2 | 973 |
Showing 1–50 of 50
Page 1 / 1