Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · MNL
Whitey Skoog
Whitey Skoog stats, teams and career impact
#433 all-timeCareer averages · 8.2 PPG · 3.3 RPG · 2.6 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Shooting guard
- Final NBA team
- Minneapolis Lakers
- Height / weight
- 5 ft 11 in (180 cm) · 180 lb (82 kg)
- Born
- November 2, 1926
- Died
- April 4, 2019 (92 yrs old)
- College
- Minnesota
- NBA seasons
- 6 seasons · 1951–52 to 1956–57
Career summaryWhitey Skoog was a shooting guard who played 6 NBA seasons, from 1951–52 through 1956–57.
- Career PPG
- 8.2
- Career RPG
- 3.3
- Career APG
- 2.6
- #38 in 1955–56
- #433 all-time
Career overview
Why Whitey Skoog ranks #433 all time
Whitey Skoog ranks #433 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #44.3. His full-career value ranks #1166, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.
450+ minutes required per season
341 games · Career Value Rank #1166
Head to head
Compare Whitey Skoog with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Whitey Skoog vs. Frankie Brian Similar career path
- Whitey Skoog vs. Jalen Green Similar career path
- Whitey Skoog vs. Terance Mann Similar career path
- Whitey Skoog vs. Charles Johnson Similar career path
- Whitey Skoog vs. Naji Marshall Similar career path
- Whitey Skoog vs. Ken Charles Similar career path
- Whitey Skoog vs. Odie Spears Same-era comparison
- Whitey Skoog vs. Dick Schnittker Same-era comparison
- Whitey Skoog vs. Connie Simmons Same-era comparison
- Whitey Skoog vs. Max Zaslofsky Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Minneapolis Lakers
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 38.8%FG%
- Three-point
- —3P%
- Free throw
- 79.9%FT%
341 career games · 9,193 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Whitey Skoog stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1956–57 | 8.7 | 3.1 | 3.3 | -2.22 | MNL | 23 | 0 | 28.5 | 35.5% | — | 93.6% | #71 | -3.4 |
| 1955–56 | 11.6 | 4.0 | 3.5 | -0.67 | MNL | 72 | 0 | 32.1 | 39.8% | — | 80.3% | #38 | 69.0 |
| 1954–55 | 10.9 | 4.2 | 3.5 | -0.93 | MNL | 72 | 0 | 32.8 | 39.5% | — | 80.6% | #50 | 55.7 |
| 1953–54 | 7.0 | 3.2 | 2.5 | -0.50 | MNL | 71 | 0 | 26.4 | 40.0% | — | 74.2% | #45 | 54.9 |
| 1952–53 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 1.2 | -1.18 | MNL | 68 | 0 | 14.6 | 38.6% | — | 75.4% | #58 | 16.0 |
| 1951–52 | 6.7 | 3.5 | 1.7 | -1.18 | MNL | 35 | 0 | 28.2 | 34.5% | — | 78.9% | #63 | 16.4 |
| Career | 8.2 | 3.3 | 2.6 | — | MNL | 341 | — | 27.0 | 38.8% | — | 79.9% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
50.5 composite · lower is better
50.8 average league finish
209 total value
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Career standing
How Whitey Skoog ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 82.5
- Qualified seasons
- 6
- All-time rank
- #433
Every season
Whitey Skoog advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1956–57Historical Defense Estimate | MNL | 30 | 23 | 656 | -2.22 | 11.4 | #71 | -3.4 | 13th | Modeled |
| 1955–56Historical Defense Estimate | MNL | 29 | 72 | 2,311 | -0.67 | 50.7 | #38 | 69.0 | 57th | Modeled |
| 1954–55Historical Defense Estimate | MNL | 28 | 72 | 2,365 | -0.93 | 35.5 | #50 | 55.7 | 49th | Modeled |
| 1953–54Historical Defense Estimate | MNL | 27 | 71 | 1,877 | -0.50 | 46.3 | #45 | 54.9 | 51st | Modeled |
| 1952–53Historical Defense Estimate | MNL | 26 | 68 | 996 | -1.18 | 39.4 | #58 | 16.0 | 31st | Modeled |
| 1951–52Historical Defense Estimate | MNL | 25 | 35 | 988 | -1.18 | 34.7 | #63 | 16.4 | 36th | Modeled |
Career movement
Whitey Skoog's box impact by season
Peak box impact -0.50 points per 100 possessions in 1953–54 · 6 seasons · 9,193 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Whitey Skoog | Frankie Brian |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.2 | -1.0 |
| 2 | -1.2 | 0.0 |
| 3 | -0.5 | -1.8 |
| 4 | -0.9 | -0.9 |
| 5 | -0.7 | -0.6 |
| 6 | -2.2 | -2.4 |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Whitey Skoog
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Frankie Brian
95career similarity score
91/100 closest-season score · 1953–54 ↔ 1952–53SG · All-Time Career #2198Jalen Green
94career similarity score
83/100 closest-season score · 1953–54 ↔ 2024–25SG · All-Time Career #2212Terance Mann
94career similarity score
97/100 closest-season score · 1953–54 ↔ 2022–23Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →