Menu
Last updated Oct 6, 2026
NBA impact data · 1950–51 to present
1958–59 NBA Player Rankings
Impact Rate and Season Value rankings for the 1958–59 regular season—the NBA season ending in 1959.
Season ending 1959
Who ranks No. 1 in 1958–59?
Bob Pettit ranks No. 1 in hussEyquation Impact Rate for the 1958–59 regular season. This is a model-based impact ranking, not the NBA scoring-leader or standings table. The top ten below compare per-possession impact within this season across 81 qualified players.
The 1958–59 NBA season ended in 1959. If you mean the season that began in 1959, see 1959–60.
- #1Bob PettitSTL100.0
- #2Elgin BaylorMNL98.8
- #3Bill RussellBOS97.5
- #4Tom GolaPHW96.3
- #5Sam JonesBOS95.0
- #6Cliff HaganSTL93.8
- #7Paul ArizinPHW92.5
- #8Kenny SearsNYK91.3
- #9Bob CousyBOS90.0
- #10Jack TwymanCIN88.8
1958–59 Impact Rate rankings
A backtested impact estimate from the statistics recorded in that era, with uncertainty ranges.
Swipe for more player stats →
| Compare | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100.0 | STL | PF | 26 | 72 | — | 39.9 | 2,873 | ||
| 2 | 98.8 | MNL | SF | 24 | 70 | — | 40.8 | 2,855 | ||
| 3 | 97.5 | BOS | C | 24 | 70 | — | 42.6 | 2,979 | ||
| 4 | 96.3 | PHW | SG | 26 | 64 | — | 36.5 | 2,333 | ||
| 5 | 95.0 | BOS | SG | 25 | 71 | — | 20.6 | 1,466 | ||
| 6 | 93.8 | STL | SF | 27 | 72 | — | 37.5 | 2,702 | ||
| 7 | 92.5 | PHW | SF | 30 | 70 | — | 40.0 | 2,799 | ||
| 8 | 91.3 | NYK | PF | 25 | 71 | — | 35.2 | 2,498 | ||
| 9 | 90.0 | BOS | PG | 30 | 65 | — | 37.0 | 2,403 | ||
| 10 | 88.8 | CIN | SF | 24 | 72 | — | 37.7 | 2,713 | ||
| 11 | 87.5 | NYK | SG | 26 | 71 | — | 36.0 | 2,558 | ||
| 12 | 86.3 | STL | C | 29 | 70 | — | 22.8 | 1,599 | ||
| 13 | 85.0 | SYR | C | 26 | 72 | — | 37.1 | 2,671 | ||
| 14 | 83.8 | DET / SYR | SF | 30 | 61 | — | 30.1 | 1,839 | ||
| 15 | 82.5 | SYR | PF | 30 | 72 | — | 36.7 | 2,645 | ||
| 16 | 81.3 | BOS | SG | 27 | 72 | — | 28.0 | 2,013 | ||
| 17 | 80.0 | BOS | PF | 24 | 66 | — | 31.7 | 2,089 | ||
| 18 | 78.8 | PHW | PG | 23 | 45 | — | 34.8 | 1,565 | ||
| 19 | 78 | PHW / SYR | PG | 29 | 57 | — | 12.2 | 694 | ||
| 20 | 76.3 | BOS | SG | 32 | 72 | — | 33.1 | 2,382 | ||
| 21 | 75.0 | DET | PF | 25 | 72 | — | 28.6 | 2,058 | ||
| 22 | 73.8 | DET | PG | 33 | 71 | — | 29.1 | 2,063 | ||
| 23 | 72.5 | DET | PG | 27 | 72 | — | 38.1 | 2,745 | ||
| 24 | 71.3 | MNL | SG | 25 | 71 | — | 15.9 | 1,132 | ||
| 25 | 70 | CIN | PF | 22 | 57 | — | 11.9 | 681 | ||
| 26 | 68.8 | CIN | SG | 25 | 71 | — | 31.7 | 2,251 | ||
| 27 | 67.5 | SYR | PG | 27 | 70 | — | 39.3 | 2,750 | ||
| 28 | 66.3 | PHW | PF | 29 | 72 | — | 34.5 | 2,482 | ||
| 29 | 65.0 | MNL | PF | 30 | 72 | — | 29.7 | 2,139 | ||
| 30 | 63.8 | MNL | PF | 22 | 72 | — | 16.7 | 1,202 | ||
| 31 | 62.5 | NYK | PG | 31 | 72 | — | 27.2 | 1,959 | ||
| 32 | 61 | BOS | PG | 26 | 49 | — | 12.4 | 609 | ||
| 33 | 60.0 | CIN / STL | SG | 25 | 62 | — | 18.2 | 1,126 | ||
| 34 | 58.8 | DET | SG | 26 | 70 | — | 18.3 | 1,280 | ||
| 35 | 57.5 | NYK | SG | 26 | 68 | — | 21.3 | 1,448 | ||
| 36 | 56.3 | NYK | SF | 24 | 68 | — | 30.3 | 2,061 | ||
| 37 | 55.0 | PHW | SG | 27 | 70 | — | 14.5 | 1,017 | ||
| 38 | 53.8 | STL | C | 31 | 72 | — | 23.8 | 1,713 | ||
| 39 | 53 | CIN / PHW | PG | 25 | 44 | — | 15.7 | 691 | ||
| 40 | 51.3 | MNL | C | 30 | 72 | — | 26.8 | 1,933 | ||
| 41 | 50.0 | NYK / PHW | PG | 30 | 71 | — | 26.5 | 1,881 | ||
| 42 | 48.8 | MNL | PG | 24 | 71 | — | 23.4 | 1,664 | ||
| 43 | 47.5 | SYR | SG | 22 | 68 | — | 23.9 | 1,625 | ||
| 44 | 46 | NYK | PG | 24 | 50 | — | 17.1 | 857 | ||
| 45 | 45.0 | SYR | PF | 24 | 67 | — | 22.7 | 1,518 | ||
| 46 | 43.8 | MNL | SG | 26 | 72 | — | 34.6 | 2,493 | ||
| 47 | 42.5 | CIN | PF | 24 | 72 | — | 23.3 | 1,674 | ||
| 48 | 41.3 | CIN | C | 25 | 67 | — | 24.2 | 1,624 | ||
| 49 | 40.0 | CIN | PG | 24 | 47 | — | 38.9 | 1,827 | ||
| 50 | 38.8 | CIN / STL | — | 25 | 46 | — | 24.1 | 1,109 |
Showing 1–50 of 50
Page 1 / 1