37.9 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · FTW / MLH / MNL / STL
Chuck Share
Chuck Share advanced stats and career rankings
35.2 average league finish
407 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Chuck Share ranks #422 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #33.3. His full-career value ranks #879, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity. Explore Chuck Share's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Chuck Share ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite37.9
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 37.9
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #422
Strongest seasons
Every season
Chuck Share advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1959–60Historical Defense Estimate | MNL/STL | 32 | 41 | 651 | -2.47 | 16.7 | #66 | -7.7 | 22nd | Modeled |
| 1958–59Historical Defense Estimate | STL | 31 | 72 | 1,713 | -0.49 | 53.8 | #38 | 62.4 | 63rd | Modeled |
| 1957–58Historical Defense Estimate | STL | 30 | 72 | 1,824 | -0.17 | 51.3 | #38 | 83.2 | 55th | Modeled |
| 1956–57Historical Defense Estimate | STL | 29 | 72 | 1,673 | -0.20 | 60.8 | #32 | 67.9 | 57th | Modeled |
| 1955–56Historical Defense Estimate | STL | 28 | 72 | 1,975 | -0.01 | 61.3 | #30 | 89.6 | 61st | Modeled |
| 1954–55Historical Defense Estimate | MLH | 27 | 69 | 1,685 | -0.37 | 51.3 | #38 | 57.4 | 53rd | Modeled |
| 1953–54Historical Defense Estimate | FTW/MLH | 26 | 68 | 1,576 | -0.35 | 51.2 | #41 | 45.9 | 49th | Modeled |
| 1952–53Historical Defense Estimate | FTW | 25 | 67 | 1,044 | -1.85 | 21.3 | #75 | 2.9 | 20th | Modeled |
| 1951–52Historical Defense Estimate | FTW | 24 | 63 | 882 | -1.65 | 28.4 | #69 | 5.8 | 27th | Modeled |
Career movement
Chuck Share's career impact by season
Peak -0.01 in 1955–56 · 9 seasons · 13,023 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutesModeled estimate
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Chuck ShareBob Ferry
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Chuck Share
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #432
Bob Ferry
94%career match
89% season match · 1957–58 ↔ 1965–66C · All-Time Career #2228Kelvin Cato
93%career match
95% season match · 1957–58 ↔ 2004–05PF · All-Time Career #2251Trevor Booker
92%career match
93% season match · 1957–58 ↔ 2016–17PF · All-Time Career #662Luke Jackson
92%career match
95% season match · 1957–58 ↔ 1970–71C · All-Time Career #1283Zaid Abdul-Aziz
92%career match
92% season match · 1957–58 ↔ 1974–75C · All-Time Career #2691Roy Hibbert
92%career match
90% season match · 1957–58 ↔ 2015–16Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →