Chris Paul
2008–09
NBA player comparison
Chris Paul vs. Steve Nash: 2008–09 season
Regular-season verdict
Chris Paul has the higher model estimate for the 2008–09 season
Steve Nash
2008–09
Impact comparison
+10.8LeadsSeason impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+1.1
#3LeadsSeason impact rank#75
78Games74
3,002Minutes2,484
22.8LeadsPPG15.7
59.9%TS%61.5%Leads
Chris Paul's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +10.8, compared with +1.1 for Steve Nash. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2008–09 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Chris Paul: 78 games and 3,002 minutes. Steve Nash: 74 games and 2,484 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
Why the model rates them this way
A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 2008–09 season
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Chris Paul | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Season impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +10.8Better result for this metric. | +1.1 |
| Season impact rank | #3Better result for this metric. | #75 |
Chris Paul: verified lineup window unavailable. Steve Nash: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Chris Paul | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 78 | 74 |
| Minutes | 3,002 | 2,484 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Chris Paul | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 59.9% | 61.5%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Chris Paul | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 50.3% | 50.3% |
| Three-point percentage | 36.4% | 43.9%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 86.8% | 93.3%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Chris Paul | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 11.0Better result for this metric. | 9.7 |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Chris Paul | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 5.5Better result for this metric. | 3.0 |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Chris Paul | Steve Nash |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 22.8Better result for this metric. | 15.7 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.
Regular Season Impact
Chris Paul has the higher model estimate for the 2008–09 season.
Chris PaulMetricSteve Nash
+10.8LeadsSeason impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+1.1
#3LeadsSeason impact rank#75
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Chris PaulMetricSteve Nash
1,022LeadsListed-team regular-season wins854
60.6%LeadsListed-team winning percentage59.8%
1050-win team seasons10
260-win team seasons3Leads
15LeadsPlayoff team seasons12
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Chris Paul leads every available measure below.
Chris PaulMetricSteve Nash
15LeadsPlayoff appearances12
149LeadsPlayoff games120
81LeadsTeam playoff wins58
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Chris PaulMetricSteve Nash
12LeadsAll-Star8
0MVP2Leads
11LeadsAll-NBA7
9LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.
Selected seasons
Era-centered impact
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Chris PaulSteve Nash
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average