Horace Grant
1987–88 to 2003–04 · 17 seasons
NBA player comparison
Horace Grant vs. Joakim Noah: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Joakim Noah ranks higher in career impact
Joakim Noah
2007–08 to 2019–20 · 13 seasons
Impact comparison
#197Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#184Leads
+4.9Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.9Leads
+3.3Best 5 average impact+3.6Leads
19.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better15.0Leads
+2,660 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,645 pts
0Top-10 impact seasons1Leads
Career Impact Rank places Joakim Noah #184 and Horace Grant #197. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Horace Grant had more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedHorace Grant26.193 · No. 197Joakim Noah24.540 · No. 184
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Horace Grant
26.193 composite · No. 197 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 121991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 19.667 | 50% | 9.833 |
| Best 5No. 121991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 25.800 | 30% | 7.740 |
| Best 10No. 121991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 151993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 371996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 43.100 | 20% | 8.620 |
9.833 + 7.740 + 8.620= 26.193
Joakim Noah
24.540 composite · No. 184 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 62013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 15.000 | 50% | 7.500 |
| Best 5No. 62013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 472009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 25.000 | 30% | 7.500 |
| Best 10No. 62013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 472009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 502018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 742015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 792008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 892007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 47.700 | 20% | 9.540 |
7.500 + 7.500 + 9.540= 24.540
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #197 | #184Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finish | 19.7 | 15.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finish | 25.8 | 25.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finish | 43.1Better result for this metric. | 47.7 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #115Better result for this metric. | #241 |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +4.9 | +5.9Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average impact | +3.9 | +4.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average impact | +3.3 | +3.6Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average impact | +2.5 | +2.5 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +2,660 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +1,645 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 1Better result for this metric. |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,165 | 672 |
| Minutes | 38,621 | 18,646 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 54.0% | 54.0% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 54.6%Better result for this metric. | 53.5% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 50.9%Better result for this metric. | 49.1% |
| Three-point percentage | 6.3%Better result for this metric. | 0.0% |
| Free-throw percentage | 69.2% | 70.0%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 10.7% | 16.3%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 2.2 | 2.8Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.5%Better result for this metric. | 17.5% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 14.7% | 18.3%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 8.1 | 9.0Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.7%Better result for this metric. | 1.5% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.2% | 3.6%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Horace Grant | Joakim Noah |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 11.2Better result for this metric. | 8.8 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Joakim Noah ranks higher in career impact.
Horace GrantMetricJoakim Noah
#197Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#184Leads
+4.9Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+5.9Leads
+3.3Best 5 average impact+3.6Leads
+2,660 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,645 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Horace Grant leads every available measure below.
Horace GrantMetricJoakim Noah
871LeadsListed-team regular-season wins554
64.0%LeadsListed-team winning percentage53.3%
10Leads50-win team seasons3
3Leads60-win team seasons1
16LeadsPlayoff team seasons8
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Horace Grant leads every available measure below.
Horace GrantMetricJoakim Noah
13LeadsPlayoff appearances8
170LeadsPlayoff games62
111LeadsTeam playoff wins34
5LeadsFinals appearances0
4LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Horace GrantMetricJoakim Noah
1All-Star2Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA1Leads
4LeadsAll-Defense3
0DPOY1Leads
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Horace GrantJoakim NoahPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Horace GrantNBA seasonJoakim Noah
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Season 13
Season 14
No season
Season 15
No season
Season 16
No season
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.