Joakim Noah
2007–08 to 2019–20 · 13 seasons
NBA player comparison
Joakim Noah vs. Marcus Camby: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Marcus Camby ranks higher in career impact
Marcus Camby
1996–97 to 2012–13 · 17 seasons
Impact comparison
#184Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#131Leads
+5.9LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.7
+3.6Best 5 average impact+4.1Leads
15.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place; closer to No. 1 is better14.3Leads
+1,645 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,603 ptsLeads
1LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0
Career Impact Rank places Marcus Camby #131 and Joakim Noah #184. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Joakim Noah had the higher single-season impact estimate.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJoakim Noah24.540 · No. 184Marcus Camby17.407 · No. 131
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Joakim Noah
24.540 composite · No. 184 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 62013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 15.000 | 50% | 7.500 |
| Best 5No. 62013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 472009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 25.000 | 30% | 7.500 |
| Best 10No. 62013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 202011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 332010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 472009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 502018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 742015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 792008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 892007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 47.700 | 20% | 9.540 |
7.500 + 7.500 + 9.540= 24.540
Marcus Camby
17.407 composite · No. 131 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 132007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 14.333 | 50% | 7.167 |
| Best 5No. 132007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 17.400 | 30% | 5.220 |
| Best 10No. 132007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 282003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 292000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 302002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 25.100 | 20% | 5.020 |
7.167 + 5.220 + 5.020= 17.407
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #184 | #131Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finish | 15.0 | 14.3Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finish | 25.0 | 17.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finish | 47.7 | 25.1Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #241 | #121Better result for this metric. |
| Peak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average | +5.9Better result for this metric. | +4.7 |
| Best 3 average impact | +4.4 | +4.4 |
| Best 5 average impact | +3.6 | +4.1Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average impact | +2.5 | +3.6Better result for this metric. |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +1,645 pts | +2,603 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 1Better result for this metric. | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 672 | 973 |
| Minutes | 18,646 | 28,684 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 54.0%Better result for this metric. | 50.3% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 53.5%Better result for this metric. | 50.5% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 49.1%Better result for this metric. | 46.6% |
| Three-point percentage | 0.0% | 20.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 70.0%Better result for this metric. | 67.0% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 16.3%Better result for this metric. | 11.3% |
| Assists per game | 2.8Better result for this metric. | 1.9 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 17.5% | 12.8%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 18.3% | 20.4%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 9.0 | 9.8Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.5% | 1.8%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 3.6% | 6.0%Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Joakim Noah | Marcus Camby |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 8.8 | 9.5Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Marcus Camby ranks higher in career impact.
Joakim NoahMetricMarcus Camby
#184Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#131Leads
+5.9LeadsPeak era-centered impactEstimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average+4.7
+3.6Best 5 average impact+4.1Leads
+1,645 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,603 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Joakim NoahMetricMarcus Camby
554Listed-team regular-season wins711Leads
53.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage47.6%
350-win team seasons4Leads
1Leads60-win team seasons0
8Playoff team seasons11Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Marcus Camby leads every available measure below.
Joakim NoahMetricMarcus Camby
8Playoff appearances11Leads
62Playoff games79Leads
34Team playoff wins37Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Joakim NoahMetricMarcus Camby
2LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
1LeadsAll-NBA0
3All-Defense4Leads
1DPOY1
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Joakim NoahMarcus CambyPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Joakim NoahNBA seasonMarcus Camby
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Season 13
No season
Season 14No season
Season 15No season
Season 16Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.