hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · DEN / HOU / LAC / NYK / POR / TOR

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Marcus Camby

Marcus Camby

Marcus Camby stats, teams and career impact

#131 all-timeCareer averages · 9.5 PPG · 9.8 RPG · 1.9 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Center
Final NBA team
New York Knicks
Height / weight
6 ft 11 in (211 cm) · 220 lb (100 kg)
Born
March 22, 1974 (52 yrs old)
College
UMass
NBA seasons
17 seasons · 1996–97 to 2012–13

Career summaryMarcus Camby was a center who played 17 NBA seasons, from 1996–97 through 2012–13.

Career PPG
9.5
Career RPG
9.8
Career APG
1.9
Best-Season Impact Rank
#13 in 2 seasons
Career Impact Rank
#131 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Marcus Camby ranks #131 all time

Marcus Camby ranks #131 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #14.3. His full-career value ranks #121, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.

Peak#13 in 2007–08

Best league finish

Sustained excellence16 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth17 seasons

973 games · Career Value Rank #121

NBA honors4× All-Defense · DPOYContext only; honors are not model inputs.

Head to head

Compare Marcus Camby with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Marcus Camby vs. Dwight Howard Defensive frontcourt roles
  2. Marcus Camby vs. Ben Wallace Defensive frontcourt roles
  3. Marcus Camby vs. Joakim Noah Defensive frontcourt roles
  4. Marcus Camby vs. Draymond Green Defensive frontcourt roles
  5. Marcus Camby vs. Al Horford Similar career path
  6. Marcus Camby vs. Paul Millsap Similar career path
  7. Marcus Camby vs. Vlade Divac Similar career path
  8. Marcus Camby vs. Patrick Ewing Similar career path
  9. Marcus Camby vs. Rasheed Wallace Similar career path
  10. Marcus Camby vs. Ray Allen Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Toronto Raptors, New York Knicks, Denver Nuggets, Los Angeles Clippers, Portland Trail Blazers, and Houston Rockets

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
46.6%FG%
Three-point
20.5%3P%
Free throw
67.0%FT%

973 career games · 28,684 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Marcus Camby stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
2012–131.83.30.6-5.43NYK24410.432.1%—42.1%—-16.0
2011–124.99.01.8+2.37HOU/POR595322.944.6%40.0%45.3%#52112.5
2010–114.710.32.1+1.90POR595126.139.8%0.0%61.4%#56110.0
2009–107.511.82.5+4.18LAC/POR747431.347.5%28.6%63.9%#13271.2
2008–0910.311.12.0+3.50LAC625531.051.2%25.0%72.5%#19203.2
2007–089.113.13.3+3.94DEN797934.945.0%30.0%70.8%#13340.4
2006–0711.211.73.2+4.67DEN707033.847.3%0.0%72.9%#17320.7
2005–0612.811.92.1+4.31DEN565433.246.5%9.1%71.2%#25229.1
2004–0510.310.02.3+3.58DEN666630.546.5%0.0%72.3%#25219.1
2003–048.610.11.8+2.91DEN727230.047.7%0.0%72.1%#28206.3
2002–037.67.21.6+3.10DEN29921.241.0%40.0%66.0%#3059.5
2001–0211.111.11.1-0.37NYK292934.744.8%0.0%62.6%#14830.6
2000–0112.011.50.8+3.41NYK636333.852.4%12.5%66.7%#29207.7
1999–0010.27.80.8+1.11NYK591126.248.0%50.0%67.0%#7889.6
1998–997.25.50.3+0.87NYK46020.552.1%—55.3%#9449.2
1997–9812.17.41.8-0.16TOR635831.841.2%0.0%61.1%#13371.0
1996–9714.86.31.5+0.78TOR633830.148.2%14.3%69.3%#9299.7
Career9.59.81.9—DEN/HOU/LAC/NYK/POR/TOR973—29.546.6%20.5%67.0%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

Film evidence

Marcus Camby highlights

Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.

Defensive retrospective

Marcus Camby defensive highlights

Marcus Camby's defensive retrospective adds visual context to the numbers on this page, especially his weak-side shot blocking, length and coverage around the rim. The vetted footage complements the season tables and impact model.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#150

17.4 average league finish

Career Value Rank#121

2,603 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Marcus Camby ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score17.4

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
331.5
Qualified seasons
16
All-time rank
#131
Strongest seasons

Every season

Marcus Camby advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
2012–13Historical Defense EstimateNYK3824250-5.43——-16.0—Limited
2011–12Historical Defense EstimateHOU/POR37591,352+2.3785.1#52112.580thBroad
2010–11Historical Defense EstimatePOR36591,540+1.9084.3#56110.075thBroad
2009–10Historical Defense EstimateLAC/POR35742,314+4.1896.4#13271.295thBroad
2008–09Historical Defense EstimateLAC34621,925+3.5094.6#19203.290thBroad
2007–08Historical Defense EstimateDEN33792,758+3.9496.4#13340.497thBroad
2006–07Historical Defense EstimateDEN32702,369+4.6795.2#17320.795thBroad
2005–06Historical Defense EstimateDEN31561,857+4.3192.7#25229.189thBroad
2004–05Historical Defense EstimateDEN30662,015+3.5893.0#25219.191stBroad
2003–04Historical Defense EstimateDEN29722,162+2.9191.8#28206.389thBroad
2002–03Historical Defense EstimateDEN2829616+3.1090.9#3059.560thStandard
2001–02Historical Defense EstimateNYK27291,007-0.3754.5#14830.649thBroad
2000–01Historical Defense EstimateNYK26632,127+3.4191.4#29207.787thBroad
1999–00Historical Defense EstimateNYK25591,548+1.1175.9#7889.668thBroad
1998–99Historical Defense EstimateNYK2446945+0.8766.3#9449.258thStandard
1997–98Historical Defense EstimateTOR23632,002-0.1658.4#13371.063rdBroad
1996–97Historical Defense EstimateTOR22631,897+0.7871.2#9299.772ndBroad

Career movement

Marcus Camby's box impact by season

Peak box impact +4.67 points per 100 possessions in 2006–07 · 17 seasons · 28,684 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Marcus CambyAl Horford
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Marcus Camby and Al Horford era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonMarcus CambyAl Horford
10.8-0.9
2-0.21.9
30.92.5
41.14.1
53.42.2
6-0.42.8
73.13.5
82.94.1
93.64.3
104.33.5
114.73.9
123.95.0
133.52.4
144.24.1
151.93.2
162.42.4
17-5.42.3
18Did not play0.5
19Did not play2.9

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Marcus Camby

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →