Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · BOS / BRK / MIN
Kevin Garnett
Kevin Garnett stats, teams and career impact
#5 all-timeCareer averages · 17.8 PPG · 10.0 RPG · 3.7 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Power forward
- Final NBA team
- Minnesota Timberwolves
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 11 in (211 cm) · 240 lb (109 kg)
- Born
- May 19, 1976 (50 yrs old)
- NBA seasons
- 21 seasons · 1995–96 to 2015–16
Career summaryKevin Garnett was a power forward who played 21 NBA seasons, from 1995–96 through 2015–16.
- Career PPG
- 17.8
- Career RPG
- 10.0
- Career APG
- 3.7
- #1 in 3 seasons
- #5 all-time
Best-Season Impact Rank
Career Impact Rank
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
Career overview
Why Kevin Garnett ranks #5 all time
Kevin Garnett ranks #5 all time. He finished #1 in 3 seasons and in the top five 10 times, giving him an elite peak. His full-career value ranks #6 across 21 seasons. Career Impact Rank averages his best three, five, and ten season ranks, with the most weight on his peak.
10 top-five · 11 top-ten finishes
1,462 games · Career Value Rank #6
NBA honors15× All-Star · MVP · 9× All-NBA · 12× All-Defense · DPOYContext only; honors are not model inputs.
Head to head
Compare Kevin Garnett with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Kevin Garnett vs. Tim Duncan Featured comparison
- Kevin Garnett vs. Karl Malone All-time forwards
- Kevin Garnett vs. Kevin McHale All-time forwards
- Kevin Garnett vs. Chris Webber All-time forwards
- Kevin Garnett vs. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Similar career path
- Kevin Garnett vs. Kevin Durant Similar career path
- Kevin Garnett vs. Shaquille O'Neal Similar career path
- Kevin Garnett vs. Chris Paul Similar career path
- Kevin Garnett vs. James Harden Similar career path
- Kevin Garnett vs. John Stockton Similar career path
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Minnesota Timberwolves, Boston Celtics, and Brooklyn Nets
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 49.7%FG%
- Three-point
- 27.5%3P%
- Free throw
- 78.9%FT%
1,462 career games · 50,418 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Kevin Garnett stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015–16 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 1.6 | +0.97 | MIN | 38 | 38 | 14.6 | 47.0% | 0.0% | 66.7% | #94 | 32.8 |
| 2014–15 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 1.6 | +1.16 | BRK/MIN | 47 | 47 | 20.3 | 46.7% | 14.3% | 80.0% | #84 | 58.1 |
| 2013–14 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 1.5 | -0.97 | BRK | 54 | 54 | 20.5 | 44.1% | 0.0% | 80.9% | #207 | 21.7 |
| 2012–13 | 14.8 | 7.8 | 2.3 | +2.62 | BOS | 68 | 68 | 29.7 | 49.6% | 12.5% | 78.6% | #44 | 178.4 |
| 2011–12 | 15.8 | 8.2 | 2.9 | +4.34 | BOS | 60 | 60 | 31.1 | 50.3% | 33.3% | 85.7% | #14 | 222.6 |
| 2010–11 | 14.9 | 8.9 | 2.4 | +4.14 | BOS | 71 | 71 | 31.3 | 52.8% | 20.0% | 86.2% | #12 | 256.7 |
| 2009–10 | 14.3 | 7.3 | 2.7 | +3.32 | BOS | 69 | 69 | 29.9 | 52.1% | 20.0% | 83.7% | #22 | 209.0 |
| 2008–09 | 15.8 | 8.5 | 2.5 | +3.93 | BOS | 57 | 57 | 31.1 | 53.1% | 25.0% | 84.1% | #13 | 197.9 |
| 2007–08 | 18.8 | 9.2 | 3.4 | +6.73 | BOS | 71 | 71 | 32.8 | 53.9% | 0.0% | 80.1% | #5 | 384.9 |
| 2006–07 | 22.4 | 12.8 | 4.1 | +6.55 | MIN | 76 | 76 | 39.4 | 47.6% | 21.4% | 83.5% | #5 | 485.3 |
| 2005–06 | 21.8 | 12.7 | 4.1 | +9.02 | MIN | 76 | 76 | 38.9 | 52.6% | 26.7% | 81.0% | #1 | 602.9 |
| 2004–05 | 22.2 | 13.5 | 5.7 | +10.24 | MIN | 82 | 82 | 38.1 | 50.2% | 24.0% | 81.1% | #1 | 709.0 |
| 2003–04 | 24.2 | 13.9 | 5.0 | +10.37 | MIN | 82 | 82 | 39.4 | 49.9% | 25.6% | 79.1% | #1 | 741.1 |
| 2002–03 | 23.0 | 13.4 | 6.0 | +8.91 | MIN | 82 | 82 | 40.5 | 50.2% | 28.2% | 75.1% | #2 | 693.5 |
| 2001–02 | 21.2 | 12.1 | 5.2 | +6.67 | MIN | 81 | 81 | 39.2 | 47.0% | 31.9% | 80.1% | #4 | 519.1 |
| 2000–01 | 22.0 | 11.4 | 5.0 | +6.82 | MIN | 81 | 81 | 39.5 | 47.7% | 28.8% | 76.4% | #4 | 540.3 |
| 1999–00 | 22.9 | 11.8 | 5.0 | +7.02 | MIN | 81 | 81 | 40.0 | 49.7% | 37.0% | 76.5% | #4 | 559.6 |
| 1998–99 | 20.8 | 10.4 | 4.3 | +7.25 | MIN | 47 | 47 | 37.9 | 46.0% | 28.6% | 70.4% | #2 | 312.2 |
| 1997–98 | 18.5 | 9.6 | 4.2 | +4.87 | MIN | 82 | 82 | 39.3 | 49.1% | 18.8% | 73.8% | #9 | 426.8 |
| 1996–97 | 17.0 | 8.0 | 3.1 | +3.34 | MIN | 77 | 77 | 38.9 | 49.9% | 28.6% | 75.4% | #29 | 302.2 |
| 1995–96 | 10.4 | 6.3 | 1.8 | +1.96 | MIN | 80 | 43 | 28.7 | 49.1% | 28.6% | 70.5% | #57 | 176.8 |
| Career | 17.8 | 10.0 | 3.7 | — | BOS/BRK/MIN | 1462 | — | 34.5 | 49.7% | 27.5% | 78.9% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
Film evidence
Kevin Garnett highlights
Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.
Career retrospective
Kevin Garnett Hall of Fame career retrospective
The NBA's retrospective puts Garnett's defensive range, passing and sustained intensity beside the peak and longevity measured on this page.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
1.5 composite · lower is better
1.4 average league finish
7,631 total value
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Career standing
How Kevin Garnett ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Career Composite Score1.5
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 333.0
- Qualified seasons
- 21
- All-time rank
- #5
Strongest seasons
Every season
Kevin Garnett advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 39 | 38 | 556 | +0.97 | 74.4 | #94 | 32.8 | 47th | Standard |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | BRK/MIN | 38 | 47 | 952 | +1.16 | 77.6 | #84 | 58.1 | 61st | Standard |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | BRK | 37 | 54 | 1,109 | -0.97 | 40.3 | #207 | 21.7 | 37th | Broad |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 36 | 68 | 2,022 | +2.62 | 87.7 | #44 | 178.4 | 86th | Broad |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 35 | 60 | 1,864 | +4.34 | 96.2 | #14 | 222.6 | 96th | Broad |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 34 | 71 | 2,220 | +4.14 | 96.9 | #12 | 256.7 | 94th | Broad |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 33 | 69 | 2,060 | +3.32 | 93.8 | #22 | 209.0 | 90th | Broad |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 32 | 57 | 1,772 | +3.93 | 96.4 | #13 | 197.9 | 90th | Broad |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 31 | 71 | 2,328 | +6.73 | 98.8 | #5 | 384.9 | 98th | Broad |
| 2006–07Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 30 | 76 | 2,995 | +6.55 | 98.8 | #5 | 485.3 | 99th | Broad |
| 2005–06Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 29 | 76 | 2,957 | +9.02 | 100.0 | #1 | 602.9 | 99th | Broad |
| 2004–05Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 28 | 82 | 3,121 | +10.24 | 100.0 | #1 | 709.0 | 100th | Broad |
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 27 | 82 | 3,231 | +10.37 | 100.0 | #1 | 741.1 | 100th | Broad |
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 26 | 82 | 3,321 | +8.91 | 99.7 | #2 | 693.5 | 100th | Broad |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 25 | 81 | 3,175 | +6.67 | 99.1 | #4 | 519.1 | 99th | Broad |
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 24 | 81 | 3,202 | +6.82 | 99.1 | #4 | 540.3 | 99th | Broad |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 23 | 81 | 3,243 | +7.02 | 99.1 | #4 | 559.6 | 99th | Broad |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 22 | 47 | 1,780 | +7.25 | 99.6 | #2 | 312.2 | 100th | Broad |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 21 | 82 | 3,222 | +4.87 | 97.5 | #9 | 426.8 | 99th | Broad |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 20 | 77 | 2,995 | +3.34 | 91.1 | #29 | 302.2 | 94th | Broad |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 19 | 80 | 2,293 | +1.96 | 82.8 | #57 | 176.8 | 84th | Broad |
Career movement
Kevin Garnett's box impact by season
Peak box impact +10.37 points per 100 possessions in 2003–04 · 21 seasons · 50,418 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Kevin GarnettKareem Abdul-Jabbar
| NBA season | Kevin Garnett | Kareem Abdul-Jabbar |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| 2 | 3.3 | 6.8 |
| 3 | 4.9 | 8.3 |
| 4 | 7.3 | 8.6 |
| 5 | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| 6 | 6.8 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 6.7 | 9.4 |
| 8 | 8.9 | 10.2 |
| 9 | 10.4 | 9.7 |
| 10 | 10.2 | 7.9 |
| 11 | 9.0 | 6.9 |
| 12 | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| 13 | 6.7 | 5.5 |
| 14 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
| 15 | 3.3 | 2.9 |
| 16 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
| 17 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| 18 | 2.6 | 0.9 |
| 19 | -1.0 | -0.4 |
| 20 | 1.2 | -2.7 |
| 21 | 1.0 | Did not play |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Kevin Garnett
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
C · All-Time Career #1
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
92career similarity score
91/100 closest-season score · 2003–04 ↔ 1975–76SF · All-Time Career #18Kevin Durant
87career similarity score
89/100 closest-season score · 2003–04 ↔ 2013–14C · All-Time Career #15Shaquille O'Neal
85career similarity score
93/100 closest-season score · 2003–04 ↔ 1999–00Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →