111.2 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · NOJ / NYK / PHI / SDC
Henry Bibby
Henry Bibby advanced stats and career rankings
114.0 average league finish
161 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Henry Bibby ranks #1983 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #93.0. His full-career value ranks #1267, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Henry Bibby's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Henry Bibby ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite111.2
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 111.2
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #1983
Strongest seasons
Every season
Henry Bibby advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980–81Historical Defense Estimate | SDC | 31 | 73 | 1,112 | -1.42 | 37.1 | #157 | 13.4 | 34th | Strong |
| 1979–80Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 30 | 82 | 2,035 | -2.07 | 25.5 | #173 | -3.1 | 24th | Strong |
| 1978–79Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 29 | 82 | 2,538 | -2.03 | 23.8 | #174 | -1.6 | 24th | Strong |
| 1977–78Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 28 | 82 | 2,518 | -1.34 | 36.4 | #151 | 37.6 | 46th | Strong |
| 1976–77Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 27 | 81 | 2,639 | -1.59 | 32.1 | #166 | 24.2 | 39th | Strong |
| 1975–76Historical Defense Estimate | NOJ | 26 | 79 | 1,772 | -1.46 | 34.0 | #125 | 21.3 | 38th | Strong |
| 1974–75Historical Defense Estimate | NOJ/NYK | 25 | 75 | 1,400 | -1.75 | 25.7 | #140 | 7.8 | 25th | Strong |
| 1973–74Historical Defense Estimate | NYK | 24 | 66 | 986 | +0.26 | 65.3 | #62 | 48.1 | 47th | Established |
| 1972–73Historical Defense Estimate | NYK | 23 | 55 | 475 | -0.76 | 47.1 | #92 | 13.0 | 34th | Modeled |
Career movement
Henry Bibby's career impact by season
Peak +0.26 in 1973–74 · 9 seasons · 15,475 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutesModeled estimate
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Henry BibbyEm Bryant
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Henry Bibby
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PG · All-Time Career #1313
Em Bryant
93%career match
92% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1965–66SG · All-Time Career #3095Tony Snell
92%career match
88% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 2013–14SG · All-Time Career #1819Matt Guokas
92%career match
88% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1969–70SG · All-Time Career #2974E'Twaun Moore
92%career match
90% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 2015–16SG · All-Time Career #2884Shandon Anderson
92%career match
89% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1997–98SG · All-Time Career #1175Adrian Smith
91%career match
88% season match · 1973–74 ↔ 1962–63Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →