124.6 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · ATL / HOU / WSB
Tom Henderson
Tom Henderson advanced stats and career rankings
126.0 average league finish
248 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Tom Henderson ranks #2149 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #108.0. His full-career value ranks #1100, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Tom Henderson's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Tom Henderson ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite124.6
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 124.6
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #2149
Strongest seasons
Every season
Tom Henderson advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1982–83Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 31 | 51 | 789 | -1.62 | 33.2 | #170 | 6.4 | 32nd | Established |
| 1981–82Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 30 | 75 | 1,721 | -1.81 | 26.0 | #189 | 6.7 | 28th | Strong |
| 1980–81Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 29 | 66 | 1,411 | -2.13 | 23.0 | #192 | -3.7 | 22nd | Strong |
| 1979–80Historical Defense Estimate | HOU | 28 | 66 | 1,551 | -2.57 | 16.9 | #193 | -18.8 | 16th | Strong |
| 1978–79Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 27 | 70 | 2,081 | -0.16 | 57.7 | #97 | 84.7 | 61st | Strong |
| 1977–78Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 26 | 75 | 2,315 | -1.45 | 33.5 | #158 | 28.6 | 41st | Strong |
| 1976–77Historical Defense Estimate | ATL/WSB | 25 | 87 | 2,791 | -0.04 | 59.3 | #100 | 120.0 | 73rd | Strong |
| 1975–76Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 24 | 81 | 2,900 | -2.10 | 21.8 | #148 | -6.5 | 20th | Strong |
| 1974–75Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 23 | 79 | 2,131 | -1.35 | 32.6 | #127 | 30.7 | 39th | Strong |
Career movement
Tom Henderson's career impact by season
Peak -0.04 in 1976–77 · 9 seasons · 17,690 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Tom HendersonIsaiah Rider
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Tom Henderson
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
SG · All-Time Career #2561
Isaiah Rider
94%career match
92% season match · 1976–77 ↔ 1997–98PG · All-Time Career #629Slater Martin
93%career match
93% season match · 1976–77 ↔ 1951–52PG · All-Time Career #2622Chris Duhon
93%career match
91% season match · 1976–77 ↔ 2008–09PG · All-Time Career #2364Jerry Sichting
93%career match
93% season match · 1976–77 ↔ 1983–84PG · All-Time Career #266K.C. Jones
92%career match
85% season match · 1976–77 ↔ 1961–62PG · All-Time Career #2435John Paxson
92%career match
96% season match · 1976–77 ↔ 1986–87Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →