4.9 score · 80% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · DAL / LAL
Maxi Kleber
Maxi Kleber advanced stats and career rankings
RolePF · Age 34
Availability43 games · 1 starts
Workload10.7 MPG · 461 minutes
Relative impactLAL #10 of 11 · PF #72 of 76
UpdatedJul 21, 2026
-7.2 total value · 395 qualified players
186.9 all-time composite · 9 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #136–#379
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Maxi Kleber ranked 361st in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 371st, led by strong steal creation despite costly turnovers. Over nearly 500 minutes, he finished in the 18th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Maxi Kleber's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
9
4.9Season Value
18
-7.2Scoring role
Usage
1
9.6%True shooting
7
50.9%3-point attempt rate
33
35.6%Free-throw rate
83
35.6%Creation and control
Assist rate
12
7.3%Turnover avoidance
9
16.8%Possession stats
Rebound rate
66
10.7%Steal rate
70
1.9%Block rate
71
2.2%Workload
Minutes per game
3
10.7Games played
14
43Total minutes
1
461Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Maxi Kleber advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | LAL | 34 | 43 | 461 | -3.77 | 4.9 | #361 | -7.2 | 18th | Limited |
| 2024–25 | DAL | 33 | 34 | 637 | -4.52 | 2.6 | #379 | -33.2 | 6th | Established |
| 2023–24 | DAL | 32 | 43 | 871 | -2.08 | 24.3 | #281 | -1.5 | 25th | Established |
| 2022–23 | DAL | 31 | 37 | 930 | -2.26 | 23.0 | #292 | -4.8 | 22nd | Established |
| 2021–22 | DAL | 30 | 59 | 1,450 | -1.38 | 34.6 | #252 | 17.9 | 37th | Strong |
| 2020–21 | DAL | 29 | 50 | 1,341 | -0.65 | 45.4 | #202 | 36.6 | 49th | Strong |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 28 | 74 | 1,890 | -0.16 | 52.8 | #167 | 72.0 | 64th | Strong |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 27 | 71 | 1,502 | +0.20 | 64.1 | #133 | 68.1 | 64th | Strong |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 26 | 72 | 1,206 | -0.13 | 56.2 | #159 | 44.8 | 50th | Strong |
Career movement
Maxi Kleber's career impact by season
Peak +0.20 in 2018–19 · 9 seasons · 10,288 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Maxi KleberJeff Cook
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Maxi Kleber
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #1949
Jeff Cook
94%career match
92% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 1982–83PF · All-Time Career #2338Stromile Swift
94%career match
92% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 2003–04PF · All-Time Career #662Luke Jackson
93%career match
90% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 1970–71SF · All-Time Career #2580Michael Kidd-Gilchrist
92%career match
88% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 2018–19SF · All-Time Career #2433Mickaël Piétrus
92%career match
91% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 2007–08C · All-Time Career #2239Kurt Nimphius
92%career match
90% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 1982–83Why this rank?
Why Maxi Kleber ranks #361
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #371
Current total +1.17 ±0.9
Split model · O +0.06 · D +0.62 = +0.68
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
4.9 unadjusted · 80% role factor · rank #361
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
What the point estimate meansLow precision
The model's 80% impact interval is -3.02 to +1.62. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 0%
- Top 50 chance
- 0%
- Top 100 chance
- 4%
- 80% rank range
- #136–#379
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →