Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · DAL / LAL
Maxi Kleber
Maxi Kleber stats, teams and career impact
#1752 all-timeCareer averages · 6.0 PPG · 4.2 RPG · 1.1 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Power forward
- 2025–26 team
- Los Angeles Lakers
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 10 in (208 cm) · 240 lb (109 kg)
- Born
- January 29, 1992 (34 yrs old)
- NBA seasons
- 9 seasons · 2017–18 to 2025–26
Selected season2025–26 · LAL · 43 games · 461 minutes
- PPG
- 2.0
- RPG
- 2.0
- APG
- 0.6
- #359 of 395 43 games · 461 minutes
- 19th percentile
Impact Rate Rank
Season Value percentile
Career overview
Why Maxi Kleber currently ranks #1752 all time
Maxi Kleber ranks #1752 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #153.0. His full-career value already ranks #1220 after 9 seasons, and his all-time position can still rise.
450+ minutes required per season
483 games · Career Value Rank #1220
Head to head
Compare Maxi Kleber with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.
- Maxi Kleber vs. Jeff Cook Similar career path
- Maxi Kleber vs. Stromile Swift Similar career path
- Maxi Kleber vs. Toby Kimball Similar career path
- Maxi Kleber vs. Luke Jackson Similar career path
- Maxi Kleber vs. Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Similar career path
- Maxi Kleber vs. Luke Walton Similar career path
- Maxi Kleber vs. Royce O'Neale Same-era comparison
- Maxi Kleber vs. Kyle Kuzma Same-era comparison
- Maxi Kleber vs. Malik Monk Same-era comparison
- Maxi Kleber vs. Dario Šarić Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Dallas Mavericks and Los Angeles Lakers
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 44.4%FG%
- Three-point
- 35.2%3P%
- Free throw
- 76.3%FT%
483 career games · 10,288 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Maxi Kleber stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.6 | -3.77 | LAL | 43 | 1 | 10.7 | 45.2% | 23.1% | 53.8% | #359 | -7.3 |
| 2024–25 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 1.3 | -4.52 | DAL | 34 | 4 | 18.7 | 38.5% | 26.5% | 76.2% | #379 | -33.2 |
| 2023–24 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 1.6 | -2.08 | DAL | 43 | 7 | 20.3 | 43.2% | 34.8% | 70.2% | #281 | -1.5 |
| 2022–23 | 5.9 | 3.6 | 1.4 | -2.26 | DAL | 37 | 5 | 25.1 | 45.6% | 34.8% | 71.1% | #292 | -4.8 |
| 2021–22 | 7.0 | 5.9 | 1.2 | -1.38 | DAL | 59 | 21 | 24.6 | 39.8% | 32.5% | 70.8% | #252 | 17.9 |
| 2020–21 | 7.1 | 5.2 | 1.4 | -0.65 | DAL | 50 | 40 | 26.8 | 42.2% | 41.0% | 91.9% | #202 | 36.6 |
| 2019–20 | 9.1 | 5.2 | 1.2 | -0.16 | DAL | 74 | 21 | 25.5 | 46.1% | 37.3% | 84.9% | #167 | 72.0 |
| 2018–19 | 6.8 | 4.6 | 1.0 | +0.20 | DAL | 71 | 18 | 21.2 | 45.3% | 35.3% | 78.4% | #133 | 68.1 |
| 2017–18 | 5.4 | 3.3 | 0.7 | -0.13 | DAL | 72 | 35 | 16.8 | 48.9% | 31.3% | 74.6% | #159 | 44.8 |
| Career | 6.0 | 4.2 | 1.1 | — | DAL/LAL | 483 | — | 21.3 | 44.4% | 35.2% | 76.3% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
RolePF · Age 34
Availability43 games · 1 starts
Workload10.7 MPG · 461 minutes
Relative impactLAL #10 of 11 · PF #70 of 76
UpdatedOct 6, 2026
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
43 games · 461 minutes · 5.6 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank
-7.3 total value · 395 qualified players
Career Composite 183.2 · lower is better · 9 seasons
Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #136–#380
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
- Impact estimate
- The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Maxi Kleber ranked 359th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 371st, led by strong steal creation despite costly turnovers. Over nearly 500 minutes, he finished in the 19th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Maxi Kleber's impact
395 qualified NBA playersEvery player in the comparison logged at least 450 minutes.
Compare with
Overall value
Impact Rate
0–100 score · higher is better
5.6 / 100Season Value
19
-7.3Scoring role
Usage
1
9.6%True shooting
7
50.9%3-point attempt rate
33
35.6%Free-throw rate
83
35.6%Creation and control
Assist rate
12
7.3%Turnover avoidance
9
16.8%Possession stats
Rebound rate
66
10.7%Steal rate
70
1.9%Block rate
71
2.2%Workload
Minutes per game
3
10.7Games played
14
43Total minutes
1
461A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Ranking editions
How the ranking changed
Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.
4.9 Impact Rate · 461 MP
Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026
First snapshot5.6 Impact Rate · 461 MP
Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026
↑2 since priorEvery season
Maxi Kleber advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | LAL | 34 | 43 | 461 | -3.77 | 5.6 | #359 | -7.3 | 19th | Limited |
| 2024–25 | DAL | 33 | 34 | 637 | -4.52 | 2.6 | #379 | -33.2 | 6th | Standard |
| 2023–24 | DAL | 32 | 43 | 871 | -2.08 | 24.3 | #281 | -1.5 | 25th | Standard |
| 2022–23 | DAL | 31 | 37 | 930 | -2.26 | 23.0 | #292 | -4.8 | 22nd | Standard |
| 2021–22 | DAL | 30 | 59 | 1,450 | -1.38 | 34.6 | #252 | 17.9 | 37th | Broad |
| 2020–21 | DAL | 29 | 50 | 1,341 | -0.65 | 45.4 | #202 | 36.6 | 49th | Broad |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 28 | 74 | 1,890 | -0.16 | 52.8 | #167 | 72.0 | 64th | Broad |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 27 | 71 | 1,502 | +0.20 | 64.1 | #133 | 68.1 | 64th | Broad |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 26 | 72 | 1,206 | -0.13 | 56.2 | #159 | 44.8 | 50th | Broad |
Career movement
Maxi Kleber's box impact by season
Peak box impact +0.20 points per 100 possessions in 2018–19 · 9 seasons · 10,288 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Maxi KleberJeff Cook
| NBA season | Maxi Kleber | Jeff Cook |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.1 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 0.2 | -0.1 |
| 3 | -0.2 | -1.8 |
| 4 | -0.7 | -1.0 |
| 5 | -1.4 | -0.3 |
| 6 | -2.3 | -2.3 |
| 7 | -2.1 | -2.5 |
| 8 | -4.5 | -5.7 |
| 9 | -3.8 | Did not play |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Maxi Kleber
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
PF · All-Time Career #1302
Jeff Cook
95career similarity score
93/100 closest-season score · 2018–19 ↔ 1982–83PF · All-Time Career #1433Stromile Swift
93career similarity score
92/100 closest-season score · 2018–19 ↔ 2003–04PF · All-Time Career #773Toby Kimball
92career similarity score
97/100 closest-season score · 2018–19 ↔ 1969–70Why this rank?
Why Maxi Kleber ranks #359
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.
Prior rank #371
Current total +1.17 ±0.9
Split model · O +0.06 · D +0.62 = +0.68
Maximum ±1.25
Points per 100 possessions · higher is better
Higher is better · 5.6 before the MPG adjustment · rank #359
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
Ranking certaintyWide
The model's 80% impact interval is -3.03 to +1.59. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 0%
- Top 50 chance
- 0%
- Top 100 chance
- 5%
- 80% rank range
- #136–#380
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →