184.1 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · ATL / GSW / UTA
Adam Keefe
Adam Keefe advanced stats and career rankings
181.4 average league finish
50 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Adam Keefe ranks #2801 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #175.0. His full-career value ranks #1625, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Adam Keefe's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Adam Keefe ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite184.1
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 184.1
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #2801
Strongest seasons
Every season
Adam Keefe advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 30 | 67 | 836 | -2.28 | 28.7 | #234 | -4.6 | 28th | Established |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 29 | 62 | 604 | -4.89 | 3.1 | #311 | -32.6 | 10th | Established |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 28 | 44 | 642 | -1.70 | 29.7 | #195 | 3.5 | 28th | Established |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 27 | 80 | 2,047 | -0.72 | 48.3 | #165 | 48.7 | 51st | Strong |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 26 | 62 | 915 | -2.39 | 25.9 | #235 | -6.7 | 27th | Established |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 25 | 82 | 1,708 | -1.11 | 47.1 | #173 | 28.6 | 48th | Strong |
| 1994–95Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 24 | 75 | 1,270 | -1.52 | 39.8 | #187 | 11.7 | 41st | Strong |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 23 | 63 | 763 | -2.82 | 15.1 | #248 | -12.2 | 17th | Established |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 22 | 82 | 1,549 | -1.56 | 36.9 | #187 | 13.9 | 38th | Strong |
Career movement
Adam Keefe's career impact by season
Peak -0.72 in 1997–98 · 9 seasons · 10,334 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Adam KeefeHakim Warrick
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Adam Keefe
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #2996
Hakim Warrick
94%career match
97% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2008–09PF · All-Time Career #2885JaMychal Green
93%career match
95% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2016–17PF · All-Time Career #2379Kevin Restani
93%career match
93% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 1979–80SF · All-Time Career #1452Joe Ellis
93%career match
90% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 1969–70SF · All-Time Career #2535Donald Royal
92%career match
90% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 1994–95SF · All-Time Career #2220Bill Willoughby
92%career match
87% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 1981–82Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →