hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · DET / FTW

Chuck Noble

Chuck Noble stats, teams and career impact

#624 all-timeCareer averages · 8.0 PPG · 2.6 RPG · 3.3 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Shooting guard
Final NBA team
Detroit Pistons
Height / weight
6 ft 4 in (193 cm) · 190 lb (86 kg)
Born
July 24, 1931
Died
March 7, 2011 (79 yrs old)
College
Louisville
NBA seasons
7 seasons · 1955–56 to 1961–62

Career summaryChuck Noble was a shooting guard who played 7 NBA seasons, from 1955–56 through 1961–62.

Career PPG
8.0
Career RPG
2.6
Career APG
3.3
Best-Season Impact Rank
#48 in 1955–56
Career Impact Rank
#624 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Chuck Noble ranks #624 all time

Chuck Noble ranks #624 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #62.7. His full-career value ranks #4709, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.

Peak#48 in 1955–56

Best league finish

Sustained excellence6 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth7 seasons

411 games · Career Value Rank #4709

NBA honorsAll-StarContext only; honors are not model inputs.

Head to head

Compare Chuck Noble with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Chuck Noble vs. Gordan Giriček Similar career path
  2. Chuck Noble vs. Quinton Ross Similar career path
  3. Chuck Noble vs. Landry Shamet Similar career path
  4. Chuck Noble vs. John Brown Similar career path
  5. Chuck Noble vs. Josh Green Similar career path
  6. Chuck Noble vs. Bryn Forbes Similar career path
  7. Chuck Noble vs. Slick Leonard Same-era comparison
  8. Chuck Noble vs. Gene Conley Same-era comparison
  9. Chuck Noble vs. Al Ferrari Same-era comparison
  10. Chuck Noble vs. Charlie Tyra Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Fort Wayne Pistons and Detroit Pistons

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
34.6%FG%
Three-point
—3P%
Free throw
73.1%FT%

411 career games · 9,212 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Chuck Noble stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
1961–622.81.72.4-5.77DET26013.928.3%—53.3%—-35.2
1960–616.32.43.8-3.70DET75022.134.6%—71.3%#72-74.0
1959–6011.33.54.6-2.56DET58027.935.7%—73.2%#68-23.2
1958–597.11.81.8-3.23DET65014.433.8%—73.5%#76-28.2
1957–587.42.32.5-3.90DET61022.333.1%—72.7%#76-63.9
1956–578.82.53.3-2.25FTW54023.336.0%—74.5%#72-7.2
1955–569.53.63.9-1.14FTW72028.035.2%—74.9%#4837.1
Career8.02.63.3—DET/FTW411—22.434.6%—73.1%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#653

67.2 average league finish

Career Value Rank#4709

-195 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Chuck Noble ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score66.2

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
80.5
Qualified seasons
6
All-time rank
#624
Strongest seasons

Every season

Chuck Noble advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
1961–62Historical Defense EstimateDET3026361-5.77——-35.2—Modeled
1960–61Historical Defense EstimateDET29751,655-3.7010.1#72-74.04thModeled
1959–60Historical Defense EstimateDET28581,621-2.5614.1#68-23.212thModeled
1958–59Historical Defense EstimateDET2765939-3.236.3#76-28.28thModeled
1957–58Historical Defense EstimateDET26611,363-3.901.3#76-63.91stModeled
1956–57Historical Defense EstimateFTW25541,260-2.2510.1#72-7.210thModeled
1955–56Historical Defense EstimateFTW24722,013-1.1437.3#4837.140thModeled

Career movement

Chuck Noble's box impact by season

Peak box impact -1.14 points per 100 possessions in 1955–56 · 7 seasons · 9,212 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutesModeled estimate
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Chuck NobleGordan Giriček
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Chuck Noble and Gordan Giriček era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonChuck NobleGordan Giriček
1-1.1-3.1
2-2.3-1.7
3-3.9-2.1
4-3.2-5.3
5-2.6-2.5
6-3.7-4.3
7-5.8Did not play

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Chuck Noble

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →