57.9 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · BOS
Jim Loscutoff
Jim Loscutoff advanced stats and career rankings
61.6 average league finish
-100 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Jim Loscutoff ranks #882 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #52.0. His full-career value ranks #4514, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity. Explore Jim Loscutoff's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Jim Loscutoff ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite57.9
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 57.9
- Qualified seasons
- 8
- All-time rank
- #882
Strongest seasons
Every season
Jim Loscutoff advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1963–64Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 33 | 53 | 451 | -3.61 | 10.9 | #83 | -18.9 | 20th | Modeled |
| 1962–63Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 32 | 63 | 607 | -3.68 | 12.1 | #81 | -27.0 | 13th | Modeled |
| 1961–62Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 31 | 79 | 1,146 | -2.81 | 15.1 | #74 | -25.2 | 10th | Modeled |
| 1960–61Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 30 | 76 | 1,153 | -4.66 | 2.5 | #78 | -85.8 | 3rd | Modeled |
| 1959–60Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 29 | 28 | 536 | -4.93 | 1.3 | #78 | -44.6 | 3rd | Modeled |
| 1958–59Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 28 | 66 | 1,680 | -1.99 | 20.0 | #65 | 0.5 | 20th | Modeled |
| 1957–58Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 27 | 5 | 56 | -7.34 | — | — | -7.8 | — | Modeled |
| 1956–57Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 26 | 70 | 2,220 | -0.29 | 59.5 | #33 | 93.2 | 67th | Modeled |
| 1955–56Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 25 | 71 | 1,582 | -1.60 | 24.0 | #58 | 15.2 | 28th | Modeled |
Career movement
Jim Loscutoff's career impact by season
Peak -0.29 in 1956–57 · 9 seasons · 9,431 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutesModeled estimate
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Jim LoscutoffJames Bailey
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Jim Loscutoff
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #2674
James Bailey
90%career match
90% season match · 1956–57 ↔ 1982–83SG · All-Time Career #3117Sasha Pavlović
89%career match
86% season match · 1956–57 ↔ 2006–07PF · All-Time Career #2642Jim Petersen
89%career match
91% season match · 1956–57 ↔ 1986–87SF · All-Time Career #2877David Benoit
89%career match
95% season match · 1956–57 ↔ 1995–96PF · All-Time Career #2859Samaki Walker
89%career match
89% season match · 1956–57 ↔ 2001–02PF · All-Time Career #3137Glen Davis
88%career match
87% season match · 1956–57 ↔ 2013–14Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →