148.8 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · BOS / DET / GSW / UTA
Jonas Jerebko
Jonas Jerebko advanced stats and career rankings
150.8 average league finish
280 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Jonas Jerebko ranks #2462 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #128.3. His full-career value ranks #1040, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Jonas Jerebko's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Jonas Jerebko ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite148.8
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 148.8
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #2462
Strongest seasons
Every season
Jonas Jerebko advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 31 | 73 | 1,218 | -0.73 | 49.2 | #188 | 32.6 | 50th | Strong |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 30 | 74 | 1,134 | -0.56 | 48.2 | #188 | 32.6 | 44th | Strong |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 29 | 78 | 1,232 | -2.09 | 28.4 | #261 | -2.3 | 28th | Strong |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 28 | 78 | 1,176 | -1.71 | 31.4 | #250 | 7.0 | 32nd | Strong |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | BOS/DET | 27 | 75 | 1,230 | +1.17 | 78.1 | #82 | 76.3 | 68th | Strong |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | DET | 26 | 64 | 741 | -0.63 | 47.8 | #181 | 20.1 | 35th | Established |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | DET | 25 | 49 | 892 | +0.07 | 62.6 | #132 | 34.8 | 47th | Established |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | DET | 24 | 64 | 1,468 | -1.06 | 43.1 | #196 | 25.6 | 47th | Strong |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | DET | 22 | 80 | 2,232 | -0.71 | 49.4 | #171 | 53.1 | 56th | Strong |
Career movement
Jonas Jerebko's career impact by season
Peak +1.17 in 2014–15 · 9 seasons · 11,323 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
—’11
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Jonas JerebkoTrevor Booker
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Jonas Jerebko
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #2251
Trevor Booker
92%career match
91% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2013–14SF · All-Time Career #2400Omri Casspi
92%career match
89% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2015–16C · All-Time Career #432Bob Ferry
92%career match
91% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1963–64PF · All-Time Career #840Len Chappell
92%career match
93% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1967–68PF · All-Time Career #2743Dante Cunningham
92%career match
92% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2011–12PF · All-Time Career #1981Ben Poquette
92%career match
90% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1981–82Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →