90.2 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · LAL / WSB
Mitch Kupchak
Mitch Kupchak advanced stats and career rankings
85.6 average league finish
258 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Mitch Kupchak ranks #1631 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #67.3. His full-career value ranks #1084, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Mitch Kupchak's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Mitch Kupchak ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite90.2
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 90.2
- Qualified seasons
- 8
- All-time rank
- #1631
Strongest seasons
Every season
Mitch Kupchak advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1985–86Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 31 | 55 | 783 | -5.29 | 3.1 | #247 | -55.1 | 4th | Established |
| 1984–85Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 30 | 58 | 716 | -3.78 | 9.1 | #231 | -27.4 | 14th | Established |
| 1983–84Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 29 | 34 | 324 | -8.10 | — | — | -42.7 | — | Limited |
| 1981–82Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 27 | 26 | 821 | -0.50 | 52.0 | #123 | 26.5 | 38th | Established |
| 1980–81Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 26 | 82 | 1,934 | -0.08 | 58.9 | #103 | 79.2 | 60th | Strong |
| 1979–80Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 25 | 40 | 451 | -4.26 | 4.3 | #222 | -21.7 | 14th | Established |
| 1978–79Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 24 | 66 | 1,604 | +1.58 | 80.6 | #45 | 127.4 | 73rd | Strong |
| 1977–78Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 23 | 67 | 1,759 | -0.27 | 58.5 | #99 | 68.7 | 57th | Strong |
| 1976–77Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 22 | 82 | 1,513 | +1.08 | 76.5 | #58 | 102.8 | 66th | Strong |
Career movement
Mitch Kupchak's career impact by season
Peak +1.58 in 1978–79 · 9 seasons · 9,905 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
—’83
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Mitch KupchakRalph Sampson
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Mitch Kupchak
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PF · All-Time Career #1290
Ralph Sampson
90%career match
90% season match · 1978–79 ↔ 1986–87PF · All-Time Career #2338Stromile Swift
89%career match
95% season match · 1978–79 ↔ 2003–04PF · All-Time Career #2815Maxi Kleber
89%career match
90% season match · 1978–79 ↔ 2018–19C · All-Time Career #2407Dewayne Dedmon
89%career match
87% season match · 1978–79 ↔ 2017–18SF · All-Time Career #2327Luke Walton
89%career match
90% season match · 1978–79 ↔ 2006–07PF · All-Time Career #2462Jonas Jerebko
89%career match
90% season match · 1978–79 ↔ 2014–15Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →