hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · CHH / GSW / LAC / ORL

Tom Tolbert

Tom Tolbert stats, teams and career impact

#2428 all-timeCareer averages · 6.5 PPG · 4.0 RPG · 0.9 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Power forward
Final NBA team
Charlotte Hornets
Height / weight
6 ft 7 in (201 cm) · 235 lb (107 kg)
Born
October 16, 1965 (61 yrs old)
College
University of California, Irvine, Arizona
NBA seasons
7 seasons · 1988–89 to 1994–95

Career summaryTom Tolbert was a power forward who played 7 NBA seasons, from 1988–89 through 1994–95.

Career PPG
6.5
Career RPG
4.0
Career APG
0.9
Best-Season Impact Rank
#242 in 1989–90
Career Impact Rank
#2428 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Tom Tolbert ranks #2428 all time

Tom Tolbert ranks #2428 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #255.3. His full-career value ranks #4748, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.

Peak#242 in 1989–90

Best league finish

Sustained excellence4 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth7 seasons

312 games · Career Value Rank #4748

Head to head

Compare Tom Tolbert with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Tom Tolbert vs. Kevin Knox Similar career path
  2. Tom Tolbert vs. Mark Acres Similar career path
  3. Tom Tolbert vs. Alaa Abdelnaby Similar career path
  4. Tom Tolbert vs. Tellis Frank Similar career path
  5. Tom Tolbert vs. Joey Graham Similar career path
  6. Tom Tolbert vs. Stuart Gray Similar career path
  7. Tom Tolbert vs. Rafael Addison Same-era comparison
  8. Tom Tolbert vs. Morlon Wiley Same-era comparison
  9. Tom Tolbert vs. Randy White Same-era comparison
  10. Tom Tolbert vs. David Wood Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Charlotte Hornets, Golden State Warriors, Orlando Magic, and Los Angeles Clippers

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
46.0%FG%
Three-point
29.6%3P%
Free throw
71.6%FT%

312 career games · 5,680 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Tom Tolbert stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
1994–951.41.70.2-10.35CHH1005.733.3%0.0%100.0%—-9.0
1993–943.82.20.6-4.42LAC49613.141.8%37.5%73.3%#278-32.1
1992–938.15.71.3-3.35ORL726125.549.8%32.1%72.6%#255-49.6
1991–922.61.60.6-8.43GSW3508.938.4%25.0%55.0%—-42.9
1990–918.14.41.2-4.38GSW623222.142.3%33.3%73.8%#269-70.4
1989–908.85.20.8-3.31GSW702119.249.3%27.8%72.6%#242-38.8
1988–892.91.50.5-6.67CHH1408.445.9%0.0%50.0%—-11.4
Career6.54.00.9—CHH/GSW/LAC/ORL312—18.246.0%29.6%71.6%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#2382

267.4 average league finish

Career Value Rank#4748

-254 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Tom Tolbert ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score263.9

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
293.0
Qualified seasons
4
All-time rank
#2428
Strongest seasons

Every season

Tom Tolbert advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
1994–95Historical Defense EstimateCHH291057-10.35——-9.0—Limited
1993–94Historical Defense EstimateLAC2849640-4.424.8#278-32.18thStandard
1992–93Historical Defense EstimateORL27721,838-3.3513.9#255-49.66thBroad
1991–92Historical Defense EstimateGSW2635310-8.43——-42.9—Limited
1990–91Historical Defense EstimateGSW25621,371-4.387.9#269-70.44thBroad
1989–90Historical Defense EstimateGSW24701,347-3.3116.0#242-38.813thBroad
1988–89Historical Defense EstimateCHH2314117-6.67——-11.4—Limited

Career movement

Tom Tolbert's box impact by season

Peak box impact -3.31 points per 100 possessions in 1989–90 · 7 seasons · 5,680 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Tom TolbertKevin Knox
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Tom Tolbert and Kevin Knox era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonTom TolbertKevin Knox
1-6.7-4.9
2-3.3-3.4
3-4.4-2.6
4-8.4-5.9
5-3.3-2.7
6-4.4-3.1
7-10.3-7.6

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Tom Tolbert

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →