158.2 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · GSW / IND / MIN / UTA
Brandon Rush
Brandon Rush advanced stats and career rankings
188.4 average league finish
138 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Brandon Rush ranks #2567 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #153.0. His full-career value ranks #1326, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Brandon Rush's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Brandon Rush ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite158.2
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 158.2
- Qualified seasons
- 6
- All-time rank
- #2567
Strongest seasons
Every season
Brandon Rush advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 31 | 47 | 1,030 | -2.66 | 20.4 | #290 | -13.5 | 20th | Strong |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 30 | 72 | 1,055 | -0.90 | 43.5 | #206 | 24.1 | 41st | Strong |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 29 | 33 | 271 | -7.73 | — | — | -31.8 | — | Limited |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 28 | 38 | 418 | -5.06 | — | — | -24.3 | — | Limited |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 27 | 2 | 25 | -11.87 | — | — | -4.9 | — | Limited |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 26 | 65 | 1,717 | +1.81 | 80.2 | #69 | 125.7 | 83rd | Strong |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 25 | 67 | 1,754 | -1.00 | 43.0 | #201 | 34.5 | 48th | Strong |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 24 | 82 | 2,491 | -0.92 | 44.0 | #189 | 54.2 | 57th | Strong |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 23 | 75 | 1,803 | -2.73 | 17.1 | #277 | -26.3 | 12th | Strong |
Career movement
Brandon Rush's career impact by season
Peak +1.81 in 2011–12 · 9 seasons · 10,564 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Brandon RushKris Dunn
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Brandon Rush
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PG · All-Time Career #2147
Kris Dunn
88%career match
82% season match · 2011–12 ↔ 2017–18SG · All-Time Career #2538Marquis Daniels
86%career match
86% season match · 2011–12 ↔ 2003–04SG · All-Time Career #1942Erick Strickland
85%career match
91% season match · 2011–12 ↔ 1999–00SG · All-Time Career #1750Šarūnas Marčiulionis
85%career match
86% season match · 2011–12 ↔ 1992–93SG · All-Time Career #2417Greg Buckner
85%career match
91% season match · 2011–12 ↔ 2004–05SG · All-Time Career #2539Gerald Henderson
85%career match
88% season match · 2011–12 ↔ 2012–13Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →