178.4 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · NJN / PHI
Jayson Williams
Jayson Williams advanced stats and career rankings
188.6 average league finish
-63 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Jayson Williams ranks #2759 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #163.3. His full-career value ranks #4296, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity. Explore Jayson Williams's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Jayson Williams ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite178.4
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 178.4
- Qualified seasons
- 8
- All-time rank
- #2759
Strongest seasons
Every season
Jayson Williams advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 30 | 30 | 1,020 | -0.75 | 45.3 | #152 | 24.3 | 45th | Strong |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 29 | 65 | 2,343 | -0.29 | 55.5 | #142 | 76.1 | 65th | Strong |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 28 | 41 | 1,432 | -2.84 | 19.6 | #255 | -23.1 | 14th | Strong |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 27 | 80 | 1,858 | -1.51 | 39.4 | #198 | 17.3 | 42nd | Strong |
| 1994–95Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 26 | 75 | 982 | -1.69 | 36.9 | #196 | 5.8 | 36th | Established |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 25 | 70 | 877 | -3.13 | 12.0 | #257 | -19.8 | 15th | Established |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 24 | 12 | 139 | -7.57 | — | — | -15.5 | — | Limited |
| 1991–92Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 23 | 50 | 646 | -7.93 | 0.0 | #290 | -74.7 | 1st | Established |
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 22 | 52 | 508 | -7.29 | 0.0 | #292 | -53.6 | 7th | Established |
Career movement
Jayson Williams's career impact by season
Peak -0.29 in 1997–98 · 9 seasons · 9,805 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Jayson WilliamsAron Baynes
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Jayson Williams
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #3090
Aron Baynes
89%career match
84% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2015–16PF · All-Time Career #2926Jason Maxiell
88%career match
85% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2007–08PF · All-Time Career #2821Corie Blount
88%career match
81% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2000–01PF · All-Time Career #2885JaMychal Green
88%career match
89% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2016–17C · All-Time Career #3099Timofey Mozgov
88%career match
93% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2014–15PF · All-Time Career #2859Samaki Walker
88%career match
85% season match · 1997–98 ↔ 2001–02Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →