Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · CHO / LAC / PHI / POR

Nicolas Batum
Nicolas Batum stats, teams and career impact
#343 all-timeCareer averages · 9.6 PPG · 4.7 RPG · 3.0 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Small forward
- 2025–26 team
- Los Angeles Clippers
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 7 in (201 cm) · 230 lb (104 kg)
- Born
- December 14, 1988 (37 yrs old)
- NBA seasons
- 18 seasons · 2008–09 to 2025–26
Selected season2025–26 · LAC · 74 games · 1,295 minutes
- PPG
- 4.0
- RPG
- 2.5
- APG
- 0.9
- #217 of 395 74 games · 1,295 minutes
- 45th percentile
Career overview
Why Nicolas Batum currently ranks #343 all time
Nicolas Batum ranks #343 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #34.3. His full-career value ranks #158, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.
450+ minutes required per season
1,205 games · Career Value Rank #158
Head to head
Compare Nicolas Batum with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Two active players open in the latest published season; switch to Career to compare their full careers.
- Nicolas Batum vs. Mike Miller Similar career path
- Nicolas Batum vs. Metta World Peace Similar career path
- Nicolas Batum vs. Thaddeus Young Similar career path
- Nicolas Batum vs. Trevor Ariza Similar career path
- Nicolas Batum vs. Kyle Korver Similar career path
- Nicolas Batum vs. Jason Terry Similar career path
- Nicolas Batum vs. Brook Lopez Same-era comparison
- Nicolas Batum vs. DeAndre Jordan Same-era comparison
- Nicolas Batum vs. DeMar DeRozan Same-era comparison
- Nicolas Batum vs. Jrue Holiday Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Portland Trail Blazers, Charlotte Hornets, Los Angeles Clippers, and Philadelphia 76ers
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 43.6%FG%
- Three-point
- 37.1%3P%
- Free throw
- 83.1%FT%
1,205 career games · 33,931 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Nicolas Batum stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 0.9 | -1.51 | LAC | 74 | 6 | 17.5 | 40.3% | 40.4% | 81.8% | #217 | 7.5 |
| 2024–25 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 1.1 | -0.05 | LAC | 78 | 8 | 17.5 | 43.7% | 43.3% | 81.0% | #165 | 54.2 |
| 2023–24 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 2.1 | -0.02 | LAC/PHI | 60 | 38 | 25.5 | 45.3% | 39.5% | 71.4% | #162 | 61.4 |
| 2022–23 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 1.6 | +0.33 | LAC | 78 | 19 | 21.9 | 42.0% | 39.1% | 70.8% | #137 | 81.3 |
| 2021–22 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 1.7 | +2.10 | LAC | 59 | 54 | 24.8 | 46.3% | 40.0% | 65.8% | #61 | 122.4 |
| 2020–21 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 2.2 | +1.11 | LAC | 67 | 38 | 27.4 | 46.4% | 40.4% | 82.8% | #101 | 115.2 |
| 2019–20 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 3.0 | -0.60 | CHO | 22 | 3 | 23.0 | 34.6% | 28.6% | 90.0% | #189 | 14.1 |
| 2018–19 | 9.3 | 5.2 | 3.3 | -0.13 | CHO | 75 | 72 | 31.4 | 45.0% | 38.9% | 86.5% | #152 | 90.3 |
| 2017–18 | 11.6 | 4.8 | 5.5 | +0.67 | CHO | 64 | 64 | 31.0 | 41.5% | 33.6% | 83.1% | #109 | 108.6 |
| 2016–17 | 15.1 | 6.2 | 5.9 | +1.76 | CHO | 77 | 77 | 34.0 | 40.3% | 33.3% | 85.6% | #60 | 196.4 |
| 2015–16 | 14.9 | 6.1 | 5.8 | +1.62 | CHO | 70 | 70 | 35.0 | 42.6% | 34.8% | 84.9% | #64 | 176.7 |
| 2014–15 | 9.4 | 5.9 | 4.8 | +1.07 | POR | 71 | 71 | 33.5 | 40.0% | 32.4% | 85.7% | #87 | 143.3 |
| 2013–14 | 13.0 | 7.5 | 5.1 | +2.44 | POR | 82 | 82 | 36.0 | 46.5% | 36.1% | 80.3% | #38 | 259.7 |
| 2012–13 | 14.3 | 5.6 | 4.9 | +2.53 | POR | 73 | 73 | 38.5 | 42.3% | 37.2% | 84.8% | #45 | 242.2 |
| 2011–12 | 13.9 | 4.6 | 1.4 | +2.43 | POR | 59 | 34 | 30.4 | 45.1% | 39.1% | 83.6% | #51 | 150.7 |
| 2010–11 | 12.4 | 4.5 | 1.5 | +1.27 | POR | 80 | 67 | 31.5 | 45.5% | 34.5% | 84.1% | #74 | 151.2 |
| 2009–10 | 10.1 | 3.8 | 1.2 | +3.40 | POR | 37 | 25 | 24.8 | 51.9% | 40.9% | 84.3% | #20 | 90.6 |
| 2008–09 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 0.9 | +0.77 | POR | 79 | 76 | 18.4 | 44.6% | 36.9% | 80.8% | #96 | 72.7 |
| Career | 9.6 | 4.7 | 3.0 | — | CHO/LAC/PHI/POR | 1205 | — | 28.2 | 43.6% | 37.1% | 83.1% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
74 games · 1,295 minutes · 34.1 / 100 · higher score is better · No. 1 is the best rank
7.5 total value · 395 qualified players
Career Composite 41.9 · lower is better · 18 seasons
Ranking certainty: Wide, likely #76–#349
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
- Impact estimate
- The live model's final estimate in points per 100 possessions, including lineup evidence. It can differ from box impact. Higher is better.
Bottom line · 2025–26
In 2025–26, Nicolas Batum ranked 217th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 273rd, led by strong steal creation despite weak rebounding. After adjusting for teammates and opponents, his on-court impact was stronger than the box score indicated, lifting his overall rating. Over about 1,300 minutes, he finished in the 45th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Nicolas Batum's impact
Overall value
Scoring role
Creation and control
Possession stats
Lineup signal
Workload
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession. The other bars show percentiles in the selected comparison group. Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup figures are points per 100 possessions; higher is better. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Ranking editions
How the ranking changed
Both editions use the source snapshot dated Jul 14, 2026. These are model-version changes, not results from new games. Each edition keeps its original published numbers.
33.8 Impact Rate · 1,295 MP
Ranking edition: Jul 21, 2026
First snapshot34.1 Impact Rate · 1,295 MP
Ranking edition: Oct 6, 2026
↑3 since priorEvery season
Nicolas Batum advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | LAC | 37 | 74 | 1,295 | -1.51 | 34.1 | #217 | 7.5 | 45th | Standard |
| 2024–25 | LAC | 36 | 78 | 1,367 | -0.05 | 57.7 | #165 | 54.2 | 59th | Broad |
| 2023–24 | LAC/PHI | 35 | 60 | 1,529 | -0.02 | 56.5 | #162 | 61.4 | 61st | Broad |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 34 | 78 | 1,709 | +0.33 | 64.0 | #137 | 81.3 | 67th | Broad |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 33 | 59 | 1,463 | +2.10 | 84.4 | #61 | 122.4 | 82nd | Broad |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 32 | 67 | 1,835 | +1.11 | 72.8 | #101 | 115.2 | 79th | Broad |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | CHO | 31 | 22 | 505 | -0.60 | 46.6 | #189 | 14.1 | 33rd | Standard |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | CHO | 30 | 75 | 2,354 | -0.13 | 59.0 | #152 | 90.3 | 70th | Broad |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | CHO | 29 | 64 | 1,981 | +0.67 | 70.1 | #109 | 108.6 | 74th | Broad |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | CHO | 28 | 77 | 2,617 | +1.76 | 83.7 | #60 | 196.4 | 88th | Broad |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | CHO | 27 | 70 | 2,448 | +1.62 | 82.6 | #64 | 176.7 | 89th | Broad |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 26 | 71 | 2,380 | +1.07 | 76.8 | #87 | 143.3 | 84th | Broad |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 25 | 82 | 2,956 | +2.44 | 89.3 | #38 | 259.7 | 94th | Broad |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 24 | 73 | 2,807 | +2.53 | 87.4 | #45 | 242.2 | 94th | Broad |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 23 | 59 | 1,791 | +2.43 | 85.4 | #51 | 150.7 | 86th | Broad |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 22 | 80 | 2,522 | +1.27 | 79.2 | #74 | 151.2 | 83rd | Broad |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 21 | 37 | 918 | +3.40 | 94.3 | #20 | 90.6 | 71st | Standard |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 20 | 79 | 1,454 | +0.77 | 71.5 | #96 | 72.7 | 62nd | Broad |
Career movement
Nicolas Batum's box impact by season
Peak box impact +3.40 points per 100 possessions in 2009–10 · 18 seasons · 33,931 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Nicolas Batum | Mike Miller |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.8 | -0.0 |
| 2 | 3.4 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 1.3 | -0.5 |
| 4 | 2.4 | 0.4 |
| 5 | 2.5 | 2.4 |
| 6 | 2.4 | 3.3 |
| 7 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| 8 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 9 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 10 | 0.7 | 1.1 |
| 11 | -0.1 | -2.0 |
| 12 | -0.6 | -0.3 |
| 13 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| 14 | 2.1 | 0.2 |
| 15 | 0.3 | -4.2 |
| 16 | -0.0 | -3.2 |
| 17 | -0.0 | -6.3 |
| 18 | -1.5 | Did not play |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Nicolas Batum
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Mike Miller
92career similarity score
81/100 closest-season score · 2009–10 ↔ 2003–04SF · All-Time Career #248Metta World Peace
92career similarity score
88/100 closest-season score · 2009–10 ↔ 2001–02PF · All-Time Career #374Thaddeus Young
92career similarity score
85/100 closest-season score · 2009–10 ↔ 2011–12Why this rank?
Why Nicolas Batum ranks #217
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Steps 1–4 use points per 100 possessions. Step 5 converts the final estimate to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Higher is better on both scales; they are not the same number.
Prior rank #273
Current total -0.34 ±1.0
Split model · O -0.06 · D -0.38 = -0.44
Maximum ±1.25
Points per 100 possessions · higher is better
Higher is better · 35.6 before the MPG adjustment · rank #217
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
The model's 80% impact interval is -1.92 to +2.59. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 0%
- Top 50 chance
- 4%
- Top 100 chance
- 17%
- 80% rank range
- #76–#349
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →