72.4 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · DAL / DET / MIN / PHO / SAC / TOR
Oliver Miller
Oliver Miller advanced stats and career rankings
77.0 average league finish
649 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Oliver Miller ranks #1232 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #51.3. His full-career value ranks #660, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Oliver Miller's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Oliver Miller ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite72.4
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 72.4
- Qualified seasons
- 8
- All-time rank
- #1232
Strongest seasons
Every season
Oliver Miller advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 33 | 48 | 506 | -0.63 | 54.4 | #152 | 12.8 | 40th | Established |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 29 | 51 | 1,088 | +1.76 | 83.1 | #55 | 80.1 | 65th | Strong |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | SAC | 28 | 4 | 35 | -11.52 | — | — | -6.7 | — | Limited |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 27 | 64 | 1,628 | -0.12 | 59.3 | #130 | 59.0 | 57th | Strong |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | DAL/TOR | 26 | 61 | 1,152 | -0.80 | 48.1 | #165 | 25.7 | 47th | Strong |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 25 | 76 | 2,516 | +1.02 | 74.8 | #83 | 147.3 | 79th | Strong |
| 1994–95Historical Defense Estimate | DET | 24 | 64 | 1,558 | +0.59 | 67.6 | #101 | 78.5 | 68th | Strong |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 23 | 69 | 1,786 | +4.04 | 94.8 | #16 | 217.3 | 89th | Strong |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | PHO | 22 | 56 | 1,069 | -0.45 | 53.9 | #137 | 34.4 | 49th | Strong |
Career movement
Oliver Miller's career impact by season
Peak +4.04 in 1993–94 · 9 seasons · 11,338 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
—’01
—’02
—’03
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Oliver MillerLarry Nance Jr.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Oliver Miller
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #940
Larry Nance Jr.
86%career match
90% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2018–19PF · All-Time Career #1686John Collins
85%career match
90% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2019–20C · All-Time Career #833Mitchell Robinson
85%career match
91% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2019–20C · All-Time Career #1484Gorgui Dieng
85%career match
84% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2014–15C · All-Time Career #839Greg Monroe
85%career match
90% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2011–12PF · All-Time Career #120Kenny Sears
84%career match
87% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 1959–60Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →