113.5 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · BRK / CHI / GSW / IND / ORL
C.J. Watson
C.J. Watson advanced stats and career rankings
107.8 average league finish
413 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
C.J. Watson ranks #2016 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #86.0. His full-career value ranks #871, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore C.J. Watson's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How C.J. Watson ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite113.5
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 113.5
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #2016
Strongest seasons
Every season
C.J. Watson advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | ORL | 32 | 62 | 1,012 | -2.63 | 20.7 | #289 | -12.8 | 21st | Strong |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | ORL | 31 | 33 | 656 | -2.64 | 16.5 | #304 | -8.4 | 21st | Established |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 30 | 57 | 1,422 | +1.30 | 79.5 | #77 | 91.2 | 73rd | Strong |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 29 | 63 | 1,193 | +0.85 | 76.2 | #83 | 65.5 | 62nd | Strong |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | BRK | 28 | 80 | 1,521 | +0.69 | 72.3 | #98 | 75.6 | 65th | Strong |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 27 | 49 | 1,159 | +0.12 | 58.0 | #145 | 45.5 | 56th | Strong |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | CHI | 26 | 82 | 1,091 | -0.14 | 58.1 | #148 | 38.3 | 50th | Strong |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 25 | 65 | 1,788 | -0.17 | 59.8 | #136 | 68.3 | 63rd | Strong |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 24 | 77 | 1,883 | -0.54 | 51.4 | #163 | 56.1 | 56th | Strong |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 23 | 32 | 368 | -2.80 | — | — | -6.1 | — | Limited |
Career movement
C.J. Watson's career impact by season
Peak +1.30 in 2014–15 · 10 seasons · 12,093 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
C.J. WatsonLarry Siegfried
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to C.J. Watson
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
PG · All-Time Career #429
Larry Siegfried
93%career match
91% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1970–71PG · All-Time Career #1756Tony Delk
93%career match
93% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2004–05PG · All-Time Career #2019Damon Jones
92%career match
92% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2007–08PG · All-Time Career #1296Jim Cleamons
92%career match
88% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1979–80PG · All-Time Career #1289Darnell Valentine
92%career match
94% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1987–88PG · All-Time Career #1885Larry Drew
92%career match
87% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1986–87Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →