169.6 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · DAL / GSW / LAC / MIN / SAS / VAN / WAS
Cherokee Parks
Cherokee Parks advanced stats and career rankings
189.8 average league finish
-17 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Cherokee Parks ranks #2679 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #167.0. His full-career value ranks #3210, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity. Explore Cherokee Parks's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Cherokee Parks ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite169.6
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 169.6
- Qualified seasons
- 7
- All-time rank
- #2679
Strongest seasons
Every season
Cherokee Parks advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 31 | 12 | 64 | -10.30 | — | — | -9.9 | — | Limited |
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | LAC | 30 | 30 | 648 | -0.96 | 47.5 | #168 | 12.8 | 37th | Established |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | SAS | 29 | 42 | 234 | -8.03 | — | — | -26.4 | — | Limited |
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | LAC/WAS | 28 | 65 | 1,054 | -1.79 | 33.3 | #219 | 4.1 | 33rd | Strong |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | VAN | 27 | 56 | 808 | -0.96 | 41.6 | #188 | 16.0 | 37th | Established |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | VAN | 26 | 48 | 1,118 | -3.69 | 6.2 | #260 | -35.0 | 3rd | Strong |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 25 | 79 | 1,703 | -1.96 | 28.1 | #229 | 1.3 | 28th | Strong |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 24 | 76 | 961 | -0.58 | 54.4 | #145 | 25.8 | 47th | Established |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 23 | 64 | 869 | -2.33 | 28.0 | #235 | -5.7 | 29th | Established |
Career movement
Cherokee Parks's career impact by season
Peak -0.58 in 1996–97 · 9 seasons · 7,459 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Cherokee ParksJoel Anthony
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Cherokee Parks
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
C · All-Time Career #2998
Joel Anthony
90%career match
91% season match · 1999–00 ↔ 2008–09C · All-Time Career #804Hub Reed
89%career match
90% season match · 1999–00 ↔ 1962–63C · All-Time Career #1835Walt Wesley
89%career match
87% season match · 1999–00 ↔ 1973–74C · All-Time Career #2976Steven Hunter
89%career match
87% season match · 1999–00 ↔ 2005–06C · All-Time Career #2971Francisco Elson
89%career match
92% season match · 1999–00 ↔ 2003–04PF · All-Time Career #2934Quincy Acy
89%career match
92% season match · 1999–00 ↔ 2015–16Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →