hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · DAL / DEN / ORL / SAC

Tariq Abdul-Wahad

Tariq Abdul-Wahad stats, teams and career impact

#2393 all-timeCareer averages · 7.8 PPG · 3.3 RPG · 1.1 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Shooting guard
Final NBA team
Dallas Mavericks
Height / weight
6 ft 6 in (198 cm) · 223 lb (101 kg)
Born
November 3, 1974 (51 yrs old)
College
Michigan, San Jose State
NBA seasons
6 seasons · 1997–98 to 2002–03

Career summaryTariq Abdul-Wahad was a shooting guard who played 6 NBA seasons, from 1997–98 through 2002–03.

Career PPG
7.8
Career RPG
3.3
Career APG
1.1
Best-Season Impact Rank
#206 in 1999–00
Career Impact Rank
#2393 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Tariq Abdul-Wahad ranks #2393 all time

Tariq Abdul-Wahad ranks #2393 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #237.0. His full-career value ranks #4271, so this placement is driven more by dominance than longevity.

Peak#206 in 1999–00

Best league finish

Sustained excellence3 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth6 seasons

236 games · Career Value Rank #4271

Head to head

Compare Tariq Abdul-Wahad with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Chris Carr Similar career path
  2. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Felipe López Similar career path
  3. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Josh Green Similar career path
  4. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Gary Phillips Similar career path
  5. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. John Wallace Similar career path
  6. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Gordan Giriček Similar career path
  7. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Emanual Davis Same-era comparison
  8. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Vladimir Stepania Same-era comparison
  9. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Bryce Drew Same-era comparison
  10. Tariq Abdul-Wahad vs. Rusty LaRue Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Sacramento Kings, Denver Nuggets, Orlando Magic, and Dallas Mavericks

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
41.7%FG%
Three-point
23.7%3P%
Free throw
70.3%FT%

236 career games · 4,807 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Tariq Abdul-Wahad stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
2002–034.12.91.5-3.93DAL14014.646.6%0.0%50.0%—-7.6
2001–025.63.51.0-3.23DAL/DEN241218.437.4%50.0%72.7%—-10.3
2000–013.82.00.8-5.14DEN291214.538.7%40.0%58.3%—-25.5
1999–0011.44.81.6-1.46DEN/ORL615625.942.4%13.0%75.6%#20617.3
1998–999.33.81.0-2.32SAC494924.643.5%28.6%69.1%#223-7.8
1997–986.42.00.9-3.49SAC591616.340.3%21.1%67.2%#282-27.4
Career7.83.31.1—DAL/DEN/ORL/SAC236—20.441.7%23.7%70.3%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#2399

269.8 average league finish

Career Value Rank#4271

-61 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Tariq Abdul-Wahad ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score258.3

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
319.0
Qualified seasons
3
All-time rank
#2393
Strongest seasons

Every season

Tariq Abdul-Wahad advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
2002–03Historical Defense EstimateDAL2814204-3.93——-7.6—Limited
2001–02Historical Defense EstimateDAL/DEN2724441-3.23——-10.3—Limited
2000–01Historical Defense EstimateDEN2629420-5.14——-25.5—Limited
1999–00Historical Defense EstimateDEN/ORL25611,578-1.4635.9#20617.339thBroad
1998–99Historical Defense EstimateSAC24491,205-2.3219.6#223-7.818thBroad
1997–98Historical Defense EstimateSAC2359959-3.4911.4#282-27.410thStandard

Career movement

Tariq Abdul-Wahad's box impact by season

Peak box impact -1.46 points per 100 possessions in 1999–00 · 6 seasons · 4,807 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Tariq Abdul-WahadChris Carr
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Tariq Abdul-Wahad and Chris Carr era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonTariq Abdul-WahadChris Carr
1-3.5-4.7
2-2.3-0.6
3-1.5-3.0
4-5.1-1.8
5-3.2-2.6
6-3.9-1.5

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Tariq Abdul-Wahad

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →