114.1 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · DEN / GSW / IND / NJN / PHI / POR / SAC / SEA
Vincent Askew
Vincent Askew advanced stats and career rankings
131.2 average league finish
218 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Vincent Askew ranks #2022 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #108.7. His full-career value ranks #1154, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Vincent Askew's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Vincent Askew ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite114.1
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 114.1
- Qualified seasons
- 6
- All-time rank
- #2022
Strongest seasons
Every season
Vincent Askew advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 31 | 30 | 443 | -2.70 | — | — | -5.8 | — | Limited |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | DEN/IND/NJN | 30 | 43 | 838 | -3.12 | 15.8 | #267 | -17.4 | 19th | Established |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 29 | 69 | 1,725 | -0.96 | 49.5 | #165 | 34.9 | 52nd | Strong |
| 1994–95Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 28 | 71 | 1,721 | -0.89 | 46.9 | #165 | 38.2 | 50th | Strong |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 27 | 80 | 1,690 | +1.51 | 83.2 | #50 | 117.6 | 75th | Strong |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | SAC/SEA | 26 | 73 | 1,129 | -0.29 | 57.3 | #127 | 38.7 | 50th | Strong |
| 1991–92Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 25 | 80 | 1,496 | -0.81 | 48.8 | #149 | 38.3 | 53rd | Strong |
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | GSW | 24 | 7 | 85 | -8.58 | — | — | -12.1 | — | Limited |
| 1987–88Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 21 | 14 | 234 | -5.00 | — | — | -14.0 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Vincent Askew's career impact by season
Peak +1.51 in 1993–94 · 9 seasons · 9,361 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
—’89
—’90
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Vincent AskewMalik Beasley
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Vincent Askew
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
SG · All-Time Career #2570
Malik Beasley
91%career match
90% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2024–25SG · All-Time Career #2472Maurice Evans
91%career match
92% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2005–06SF · All-Time Career #2414Devean George
90%career match
89% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2005–06SF · All-Time Career #2644Derrick Jones Jr.
90%career match
87% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2025–26SF · All-Time Career #2627Kent Bazemore
90%career match
97% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2017–18SF · All-Time Career #2605Joe Harris
90%career match
93% season match · 1993–94 ↔ 2017–18Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →