107.9 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · BOS / DAL / IND / MIL / NYK / VAN
Erick Strickland
Erick Strickland advanced stats and career rankings
99.0 average league finish
235 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Erick Strickland ranks #1942 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #69.0. His full-career value ranks #1120, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Erick Strickland's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Erick Strickland ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite107.9
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 107.9
- Qualified seasons
- 9
- All-time rank
- #1942
Strongest seasons
Every season
Erick Strickland advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004–05Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 31 | 62 | 1,014 | -4.70 | 4.1 | #330 | -51.9 | 3rd | Strong |
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | MIL | 30 | 43 | 571 | -0.82 | 50.8 | #164 | 12.9 | 41st | Established |
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 29 | 71 | 1,275 | +0.17 | 67.9 | #103 | 52.7 | 58th | Strong |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 28 | 79 | 1,643 | +0.10 | 61.9 | #124 | 66.6 | 61st | Strong |
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | NYK/VAN | 27 | 50 | 830 | -1.41 | 39.1 | #200 | 9.0 | 36th | Established |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 26 | 68 | 2,025 | +1.44 | 79.7 | #66 | 137.7 | 80th | Strong |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 25 | 33 | 567 | +2.72 | 86.6 | #38 | 49.6 | 58th | Established |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 24 | 67 | 1,505 | -3.40 | 12.0 | #280 | -39.4 | 6th | Strong |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 23 | 28 | 759 | -2.19 | 28.2 | #228 | -2.7 | 30th | Established |
Career movement
Erick Strickland's career impact by season
Peak +2.72 in 1998–99 · 9 seasons · 10,189 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Erick StricklandGreg Buckner
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Erick Strickland
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
SG · All-Time Career #2417
Greg Buckner
91%career match
84% season match · 1998–99 ↔ 2004–05SG · All-Time Career #2371Anfernee Simons
90%career match
84% season match · 1998–99 ↔ 2023–24PG · All-Time Career #1928T.J. Ford
90%career match
88% season match · 1998–99 ↔ 2007–08SG · All-Time Career #2132Bogdan Bogdanović
90%career match
87% season match · 1998–99 ↔ 2020–21SG · All-Time Career #843Stu Lantz
89%career match
81% season match · 1998–99 ↔ 1973–74PG · All-Time Career #1906Elliot Perry
89%career match
81% season match · 1998–99 ↔ 1996–97Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →