83.2 score · 91% MPG role factor
Explore rankings
Player profile · ATL / BOS / GSW / OKC / PHI

Al Horford
Al Horford advanced stats and career rankings
36.1 total value · 395 qualified players
19.1 all-time composite · 19 seasons
Low ranking precision · Likely rank #29–#265
Bottom line · 2025–26
Al Horford delivered a strong 2025–26 campaign, ranking 44th in per-minute impact. His box-score profile ranked 38th, led by strong passing despite below-average scoring efficiency. A smaller role at 21.5 minutes per game lowered his overall impact rating. At age 39, he still played nearly 1,000 minutes and finished in the 77th percentile for total season value.
2025–26 NBA percentile rankings: What drives Al Horford's impact
Overall value
Scoring role
Creation and control
Possession stats
Lineup signal
Workload
Farther right means more of the named trait, not automatically better basketball. Turnover avoidance reverses turnover rate. Lineup rows exclude players below the 1,000-possession lineup-sample floor.
Every season
Al Horford advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26live model | GSW | 39 | 45 | 969 | +2.86 | 83.2 | #44 | 36.1 | 77th | Established |
| 2024–25 | BOS | 38 | 60 | 1,659 | +0.45 | 65.2 | #136 | 81.2 | 70th | Strong |
| 2023–24 | BOS | 37 | 65 | 1,740 | +2.34 | 85.7 | #54 | 153.0 | 85th | Strong |
| 2022–23 | BOS | 36 | 63 | 1,922 | +2.38 | 88.6 | #44 | 172.8 | 87th | Strong |
| 2021–22 | BOS | 35 | 69 | 2,005 | +3.16 | 91.9 | #32 | 208.2 | 92nd | Strong |
| 2020–21 | OKC | 34 | 28 | 782 | +4.08 | 94.8 | #20 | 100.0 | 76th | Established |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | PHI | 33 | 67 | 2,025 | +2.37 | 86.4 | #49 | 182.3 | 91st | Strong |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 32 | 68 | 1,973 | +4.97 | 95.4 | #18 | 285.3 | 94th | Strong |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 31 | 72 | 2,277 | +3.93 | 94.5 | #21 | 270.1 | 94th | Strong |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 30 | 68 | 2,193 | +3.49 | 92.8 | #27 | 242.7 | 93rd | Strong |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 29 | 82 | 2,631 | +4.31 | 95.0 | #19 | 335.7 | 96th | Strong |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 28 | 76 | 2,318 | +4.11 | 95.4 | #18 | 276.9 | 95th | Strong |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 27 | 29 | 958 | +3.53 | 93.9 | #22 | 104.5 | 74th | Established |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 26 | 74 | 2,756 | +2.77 | 89.7 | #37 | 253.6 | 94th | Strong |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 25 | 11 | 348 | +2.20 | — | — | 27.5 | — | Limited |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 24 | 77 | 2,704 | +4.11 | 96.3 | #14 | 307.1 | 96th | Strong |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 23 | 81 | 2,845 | +2.55 | 89.6 | #36 | 243.0 | 93rd | Strong |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 22 | 67 | 2,242 | +1.90 | 85.6 | #49 | 163.3 | 86th | Strong |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 21 | 81 | 2,540 | -0.92 | 44.1 | #186 | 52.1 | 54th | Strong |
Career movement
Al Horford's career impact by season
Peak +4.97 in 2018–19 · 19 seasons · 36,887 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Al Horford
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
Marcus Camby
91%career match
93% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 2006–07C · All-Time Career #72Pau Gasol
90%career match
91% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 2015–16C · All-Time Career #103Patrick Ewing
88%career match
84% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 1993–94C · All-Time Career #134Moses Malone
87%career match
89% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 1986–87SF · All-Time Career #132Andre Iguodala
87%career match
84% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 2011–12C · All-Time Career #162Ben Wallace
87%career match
86% season match · 2018–19 ↔ 2005–06Why this rank?
Why Al Horford ranks #44
The current model starts with box production, checks it against multi-season lineup evidence, caps that correction, then accounts for how many minutes the player was trusted to play each game.
Prior rank #38
Current total +0.17 ±1.0
Split model · O +0.49 · D -0.70 = -0.22
Maximum ±0.75
Before the within-season scale
89.3 unadjusted · 91% role factor · rank #44
RAPM estimates lineup impact while controlling for the other nine players on the floor. The multi-season blend, current total model, and current offensive/defensive split are separate estimates, so they need not equal one another. hussEyquation uses the multi-season signal as a bounded correction, not as a standalone verdict.
The model's 80% impact interval is -0.42 to +4.05. Exact ordering is difficult when many players have overlapping estimates.
- Top 25 chance
- 8%
- Top 50 chance
- 25%
- Top 100 chance
- 49%
- 80% rank range
- #29–#265
Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →