95.2 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · BOS / SAC / SEA / WSB
Pervis Ellison
Pervis Ellison advanced stats and career rankings
115.0 average league finish
421 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Pervis Ellison ranks #1738 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #52.7. His full-career value ranks #863, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Pervis Ellison's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Pervis Ellison ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 95.2
- Qualified seasons
- 7
- All-time rank
- #1738
Every season
Pervis Ellison advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 33 | 9 | 40 | -12.04 | — | — | -7.7 | — | Limited |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 32 | 30 | 269 | -5.47 | — | — | -18.4 | — | Limited |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 30 | 33 | 447 | -0.24 | — | — | 15.3 | — | Limited |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 29 | 6 | 125 | -7.24 | — | — | -13.1 | — | Limited |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 28 | 69 | 1,431 | -1.35 | 41.8 | #190 | 18.6 | 43rd | Strong |
| 1994–95Historical Defense Estimate | BOS | 27 | 55 | 1,083 | -3.50 | 13.9 | #267 | -31.9 | 12th | Strong |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 26 | 47 | 1,178 | -3.27 | 10.3 | #262 | -29.9 | 9th | Strong |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 25 | 49 | 1,701 | +1.92 | 85.1 | #45 | 135.9 | 78th | Strong |
| 1991–92Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 24 | 66 | 2,511 | +3.33 | 93.4 | #20 | 272.2 | 92nd | Strong |
| 1990–91Historical Defense Estimate | WSB | 23 | 76 | 1,942 | +0.42 | 68.4 | #93 | 95.5 | 67th | Strong |
| 1989–90Historical Defense Estimate | SAC | 22 | 34 | 866 | -2.88 | 21.3 | #227 | -15.3 | 23rd | Established |
Career movement
Pervis Ellison's career impact by season
Peak +3.33 in 1991–92 · 11 seasons · 11,593 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Pervis Ellison
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
Dale Schlueter
89%career match
93% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 1971–72C · All-Time Career #1168Kent Benson
88%career match
91% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 1978–79C · All-Time Career #1656Billy Paultz
87%career match
87% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 1977–78C · All-Time Career #2030Emeka Okafor
87%career match
94% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2006–07C · All-Time Career #1657Richaun Holmes
87%career match
83% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 2020–21C · All-Time Career #628Jim Fox
87%career match
86% season match · 1991–92 ↔ 1968–69Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →