Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · ATL / DEN / MIA / MIN
LaPhonso Ellis
LaPhonso Ellis stats, teams and career impact
#1186 all-timeCareer averages · 11.9 PPG · 6.5 RPG · 1.6 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Power forward
- Final NBA team
- Miami Heat
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 8 in (203 cm) · 240 lb (109 kg)
- Born
- May 5, 1970 (56 yrs old)
- College
- Notre Dame
- NBA seasons
- 11 seasons · 1992–93 to 2002–03
Career summaryLaPhonso Ellis was a power forward who played 11 NBA seasons, from 1992–93 through 2002–03.
- Career PPG
- 11.9
- Career RPG
- 6.5
- Career APG
- 1.6
- #81 in 1996–97
- #1186 all-time
Career overview
Why LaPhonso Ellis ranks #1186 all time
LaPhonso Ellis ranks #1186 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #89.0. His full-career value ranks #812, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.
450+ minutes required per season
624 games · Career Value Rank #812
Head to head
Compare LaPhonso Ellis with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Patrick Patterson Similar career path
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Brian Grant Similar career path
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Joe Graboski Similar career path
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. John Salley Similar career path
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Maurice Lucas Similar career path
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Dave Greenwood Similar career path
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Chris Whitney Same-era comparison
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Hubert Davis Same-era comparison
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Chris Mills Same-era comparison
- LaPhonso Ellis vs. Chris Gatling Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Denver Nuggets, Atlanta Hawks, Minnesota Timberwolves, and Miami Heat
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 45.2%FG%
- Three-point
- 30.2%3P%
- Free throw
- 73.0%FT%
624 career games · 17,616 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
LaPhonso Ellis stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| 2002–03 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 0.3 | -2.06 | MIA | 55 | 3 | 14.3 | 38.2% | 25.2% | 75.8% | #224 | -0.9 |
| 2001–02 | 7.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | -2.76 | MIA | 66 | 14 | 25.5 | 41.8% | 30.6% | 63.1% | #258 | -23.3 |
| 2000–01 | 9.4 | 6.0 | 1.1 | -0.62 | MIN | 82 | 5 | 23.8 | 46.4% | 31.8% | 79.0% | #156 | 51.3 |
| 1999–00 | 8.4 | 5.0 | 1.0 | -1.60 | ATL | 58 | 8 | 22.6 | 45.0% | 14.3% | 69.5% | #213 | 10.0 |
| 1998–99 | 10.2 | 5.5 | 0.9 | -3.06 | ATL | 20 | 20 | 26.9 | 42.1% | 20.0% | 70.5% | #246 | -10.2 |
| 1997–98 | 14.3 | 7.2 | 2.8 | -0.53 | DEN | 76 | 71 | 33.9 | 40.7% | 28.4% | 80.5% | #156 | 70.5 |
| 1996–97 | 21.9 | 7.0 | 2.4 | +1.13 | DEN | 55 | 49 | 36.4 | 43.9% | 36.7% | 77.3% | #81 | 120.7 |
| 1995–96 | 10.5 | 7.2 | 1.6 | -2.67 | DEN | 45 | 28 | 28.2 | 43.8% | 18.2% | 60.1% | #248 | -16.4 |
| 1994–95 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 0.7 | -9.12 | DEN | 6 | 0 | 9.7 | 36.0% | — | 100.0% | — | -7.9 |
| 1993–94 | 15.4 | 8.6 | 2.1 | +0.00 | DEN | 79 | 79 | 34.2 | 50.2% | 30.4% | 67.4% | #109 | 108.3 |
| 1992–93 | 14.7 | 9.1 | 1.8 | +0.94 | DEN | 82 | 82 | 33.5 | 50.4% | 15.4% | 74.8% | #77 | 168.3 |
| Career | 11.9 | 6.5 | 1.6 | — | ATL/DEN/MIA/MIN | 624 | — | 28.2 | 45.2% | 30.2% | 73.0% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Era-centered box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average.
- Impact Rate Rank
- The player's place among qualified players in one season.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
114.6 composite · lower is better
115.8 average league finish
471 total value
Career standing
How LaPhonso Ellis ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 319.5
- Qualified seasons
- 10
- All-time rank
- #1186
Every season
LaPhonso Ellis advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | MIA | 32 | 55 | 784 | -2.06 | 29.9 | #224 | -0.9 | 31st | Standard |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | MIA | 31 | 66 | 1,684 | -2.76 | 20.4 | #258 | -23.3 | 16th | Broad |
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 30 | 82 | 1,948 | -0.62 | 52.6 | #156 | 51.3 | 60th | Broad |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 29 | 58 | 1,309 | -1.60 | 33.8 | #213 | 10.0 | 33rd | Broad |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 28 | 20 | 539 | -3.06 | 11.2 | #246 | -10.2 | 15th | Standard |
| 1997–98Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 27 | 76 | 2,575 | -0.53 | 51.1 | #156 | 70.5 | 62nd | Broad |
| 1996–97Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 26 | 55 | 2,002 | +1.13 | 74.7 | #81 | 120.7 | 77th | Broad |
| 1995–96Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 25 | 45 | 1,269 | -2.67 | 24.0 | #248 | -16.4 | 22nd | Broad |
| 1994–95Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 24 | 6 | 58 | -9.12 | — | — | -7.9 | — | Limited |
| 1993–94Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 23 | 79 | 2,699 | +0.00 | 62.9 | #109 | 108.3 | 72nd | Broad |
| 1992–93Historical Defense Estimate | DEN | 22 | 82 | 2,749 | +0.94 | 74.2 | #77 | 168.3 | 82nd | Broad |
Career movement
LaPhonso Ellis's career impact by season
Peak +1.13 in 1996–97 · 11 seasons · 17,616 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. The vertical scale adapts to this player's range and always includes zero.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | LaPhonso Ellis | Patrick Patterson |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| 2 | 0.0 | -3.3 |
| 3 | -9.1 | -0.8 |
| 4 | -2.7 | 0.5 |
| 5 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| 6 | -0.5 | -0.9 |
| 7 | -3.1 | -0.9 |
| 8 | -1.6 | -0.4 |
| 9 | -0.6 | -2.3 |
| 10 | -2.8 | -0.9 |
| 11 | -2.1 | -1.6 |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to LaPhonso Ellis
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Patrick Patterson
91career similarity score
96/100 closest-season score · 1996–97 ↔ 2014–15PF · All-Time Career #1246Brian Grant
91career similarity score
92/100 closest-season score · 1996–97 ↔ 1997–98PF · All-Time Career #256Joe Graboski
90career similarity score
88/100 closest-season score · 1996–97 ↔ 1958–59Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →