149.7 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · ATL / DET / LAL / MIN / ORL / SAC / WAS
Maurice Evans
Maurice Evans advanced stats and career rankings
166.8 average league finish
131 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Maurice Evans ranks #2472 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #137.7. His full-career value ranks #1338, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Maurice Evans's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Maurice Evans ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Career Composite149.7
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 149.7
- Qualified seasons
- 7
- All-time rank
- #2472
Strongest seasons
Every season
Maurice Evans advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | WAS | 33 | 24 | 343 | -4.05 | — | — | -13.6 | — | Limited |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | ATL/WAS | 32 | 73 | 1,549 | -2.79 | 16.8 | #293 | -23.3 | 13th | Strong |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 31 | 79 | 1,317 | -0.82 | 46.7 | #180 | 29.2 | 45th | Strong |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 30 | 80 | 1,840 | -1.07 | 42.6 | #192 | 31.9 | 46th | Strong |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | LAL/ORL | 29 | 75 | 1,720 | -0.47 | 52.6 | #158 | 51.4 | 53rd | Strong |
| 2006–07Historical Defense Estimate | LAL | 28 | 76 | 1,732 | -2.14 | 27.5 | #243 | -4.8 | 26th | Strong |
| 2005–06Historical Defense Estimate | DET | 27 | 80 | 1,139 | +1.04 | 77.4 | #75 | 62.7 | 64th | Strong |
| 2004–05Historical Defense Estimate | SAC | 26 | 65 | 1,233 | -1.78 | 33.5 | #229 | 5.4 | 34th | Strong |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 23 | 10 | 45 | -11.08 | — | — | -7.7 | — | Limited |
Career movement
Maurice Evans's career impact by season
Peak +1.04 in 2005–06 · 9 seasons · 10,918 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Era-centered box impactMinutes
—’03
—’04
Across-era box estimateWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Maurice EvansTravis Outlaw
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Maurice Evans
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
SF · All-Time Career #2513
Travis Outlaw
91%career match
88% season match · 2005–06 ↔ 2009–10SG · All-Time Career #2570Malik Beasley
91%career match
92% season match · 2005–06 ↔ 2020–21SG · All-Time Career #2480Devin Brown
91%career match
96% season match · 2005–06 ↔ 2004–05SG · All-Time Career #2022Vincent Askew
91%career match
92% season match · 2005–06 ↔ 1993–94SG · All-Time Career #2648Gary Trent Jr.
90%career match
84% season match · 2005–06 ↔ 2022–23SG · All-Time Career #2705Justin Holiday
90%career match
92% season match · 2005–06 ↔ 2016–17Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →