Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · DEN / IND / MEM / OKC / POR / SEA / UTA
Earl Watson
Earl Watson stats, teams and career impact
#1334 all-timeCareer averages · 6.4 PPG · 2.3 RPG · 4.4 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Point guard
- Final NBA team
- Portland Trail Blazers
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 1 in (185 cm) · 195 lb (88 kg)
- Born
- June 12, 1979 (47 yrs old)
- College
- UCLA
- NBA seasons
- 13 seasons · 2001–02 to 2013–14
Career summaryEarl Watson was a point guard who played 13 NBA seasons, from 2001–02 through 2013–14.
- Career PPG
- 6.4
- Career RPG
- 2.3
- Career APG
- 4.4
- #90 in 2005–06
- #1334 all-time
Best-Season Impact Rank
Career Impact Rank
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
Career overview
Why Earl Watson ranks #1334 all time
Earl Watson ranks #1334 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #110.7. His full-career value ranks #1044, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.
450+ minutes required per season
878 games · Career Value Rank #1044
Head to head
Compare Earl Watson with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Earl Watson vs. Rory Sparrow Similar career path
- Earl Watson vs. Steve Blake Similar career path
- Earl Watson vs. Eric Snow Similar career path
- Earl Watson vs. Jordan Clarkson Similar career path
- Earl Watson vs. Marcus Smart Similar career path
- Earl Watson vs. Ish Smith Similar career path
- Earl Watson vs. Samuel Dalembert Same-era comparison
- Earl Watson vs. Mike James Same-era comparison
- Earl Watson vs. Brendan Haywood Same-era comparison
- Earl Watson vs. John Salmons Same-era comparison
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Seattle SuperSonics, Memphis Grizzlies, Denver Nuggets, Oklahoma City Thunder, Indiana Pacers, Utah Jazz, and Portland Trail Blazers
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 41.1%FG%
- Three-point
- 32.4%3P%
- Free throw
- 70.3%FT%
878 career games · 19,494 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Earl Watson stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013–14 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.2 | -9.14 | POR | 24 | 0 | 6.7 | 27.3% | 28.6% | 100.0% | — | -22.7 |
| 2012–13 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 4.0 | -3.82 | UTA | 48 | 4 | 17.3 | 30.8% | 17.9% | 68.0% | #327 | -28.5 |
| 2011–12 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 4.3 | -1.91 | UTA | 50 | 2 | 20.7 | 33.8% | 19.2% | 67.4% | #248 | 1.8 |
| 2010–11 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 3.5 | -1.82 | UTA | 80 | 13 | 19.6 | 41.0% | 33.6% | 67.1% | #245 | 5.5 |
| 2009–10 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 5.1 | -1.71 | IND | 79 | 52 | 29.4 | 42.6% | 28.8% | 71.0% | #248 | 13.8 |
| 2008–09 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 5.8 | -3.75 | OKC | 68 | 18 | 26.1 | 38.4% | 23.5% | 75.5% | #311 | -60.8 |
| 2007–08 | 10.7 | 2.9 | 6.8 | -0.35 | SEA | 78 | 73 | 29.1 | 45.4% | 37.1% | 76.6% | #150 | 75.2 |
| 2006–07 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 5.7 | -0.59 | SEA | 77 | 25 | 27.9 | 38.3% | 32.9% | 73.5% | #171 | 58.1 |
| 2005–06 | 8.9 | 2.3 | 4.1 | +0.61 | DEN/SEA | 70 | 10 | 22.5 | 43.0% | 40.4% | 67.6% | #90 | 79.9 |
| 2004–05 | 7.7 | 2.0 | 4.5 | -0.88 | MEM | 80 | 14 | 22.6 | 42.6% | 31.9% | 65.9% | #178 | 37.5 |
| 2003–04 | 5.7 | 2.2 | 5.0 | -0.94 | MEM | 81 | 14 | 20.6 | 37.1% | 24.5% | 65.2% | #176 | 33.8 |
| 2002–03 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 2.8 | +0.48 | MEM | 79 | 2 | 17.3 | 43.5% | 34.1% | 72.1% | #92 | 65.4 |
| 2001–02 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 2.0 | -0.92 | SEA | 64 | 0 | 15.1 | 45.3% | 36.4% | 63.9% | #176 | 19.4 |
| Career | 6.4 | 2.3 | 4.4 | — | DEN/IND/MEM/OKC/POR/SEA/UTA | 878 | — | 22.2 | 41.1% | 32.4% | 70.3% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
131.6 composite · lower is better
135.8 average league finish
278 total value
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Career standing
How Earl Watson ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Career Composite Score131.6
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 335.5
- Qualified seasons
- 12
- All-time rank
- #1334
Strongest seasons
Every season
Earl Watson advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | POR | 34 | 24 | 161 | -9.14 | — | — | -22.7 | — | Limited |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 33 | 48 | 829 | -3.82 | 6.9 | #327 | -28.5 | 9th | Standard |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 32 | 50 | 1,033 | -1.91 | 28.0 | #248 | 1.8 | 28th | Broad |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | UTA | 31 | 80 | 1,567 | -1.82 | 30.5 | #245 | 5.5 | 31st | Broad |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 30 | 79 | 2,322 | -1.71 | 26.5 | #248 | 13.8 | 33rd | Broad |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | OKC | 29 | 68 | 1,776 | -3.75 | 6.9 | #311 | -60.8 | 0th | Broad |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 28 | 78 | 2,269 | -0.35 | 55.0 | #150 | 75.2 | 67th | Broad |
| 2006–07Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 27 | 77 | 2,152 | -0.59 | 49.1 | #171 | 58.1 | 57th | Broad |
| 2005–06Historical Defense Estimate | DEN/SEA | 26 | 70 | 1,578 | +0.61 | 72.9 | #90 | 79.9 | 67th | Broad |
| 2004–05Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 25 | 80 | 1,808 | -0.88 | 48.4 | #178 | 37.5 | 51st | Broad |
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 24 | 81 | 1,669 | -0.94 | 47.1 | #176 | 33.8 | 52nd | Broad |
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 23 | 79 | 1,366 | +0.48 | 71.4 | #92 | 65.4 | 63rd | Broad |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | SEA | 22 | 64 | 964 | -0.92 | 45.8 | #176 | 19.4 | 44th | Standard |
Career movement
Earl Watson's box impact by season
Peak box impact +0.61 points per 100 possessions in 2005–06 · 13 seasons · 19,494 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
Earl WatsonRory Sparrow
| NBA season | Earl Watson | Rory Sparrow |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.9 | -4.5 |
| 2 | 0.5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | -0.9 | -0.6 |
| 4 | -0.9 | -1.3 |
| 5 | 0.6 | -0.1 |
| 6 | -0.6 | 0.1 |
| 7 | -0.3 | -2.5 |
| 8 | -3.8 | -3.4 |
| 9 | -1.7 | -1.1 |
| 10 | -1.8 | -3.2 |
| 11 | -1.9 | -0.5 |
| 12 | -3.8 | -5.9 |
| 13 | -9.1 | Did not play |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Earl Watson
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
PG · All-Time Career #1245
Rory Sparrow
93career similarity score
89/100 closest-season score · 2005–06 ↔ 1984–85PG · All-Time Career #1489Steve Blake
93career similarity score
95/100 closest-season score · 2005–06 ↔ 2005–06PG · All-Time Career #1251Eric Snow
93career similarity score
95/100 closest-season score · 2005–06 ↔ 1998–99Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →