hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · ATL / BRK / CHI / GSW / LAC / MIN / NYK / PHO / POR

Jamal Crawford

Jamal Crawford stats, teams and career impact

#703 all-timeCareer averages · 14.6 PPG · 2.2 RPG · 3.4 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Shooting guard
Final NBA team
Brooklyn Nets
Height / weight
6 ft 5 in (196 cm) · 185 lb (84 kg)
Born
March 20, 1980 (46 yrs old)
College
Michigan
NBA seasons
20 seasons · 2000–01 to 2019–20

Career summaryJamal Crawford was a shooting guard who played 20 NBA seasons, from 2000–01 through 2019–20.

Career PPG
14.6
Career RPG
2.2
Career APG
3.4
Best-Season Impact Rank
#50 in 2009–10
Career Impact Rank
#703 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Jamal Crawford ranks #703 all time

Jamal Crawford ranks #703 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #55.7. His full-career value ranks #418, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.

Peak#50 in 2009–10

Best league finish

Sustained excellence19 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth20 seasons

1,327 games · Career Value Rank #418

NBA honors3× Sixth ManContext only; honors are not model inputs.

Head to head

Compare Jamal Crawford with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Jamal Crawford vs. Eric Gordon Similar career path
  2. Jamal Crawford vs. Derek Fisher Similar career path
  3. Jamal Crawford vs. Rudy Gay Similar career path
  4. Jamal Crawford vs. Charles Oakley Similar career path
  5. Jamal Crawford vs. Joe Johnson Similar career path
  6. Jamal Crawford vs. Dale Ellis Similar career path
  7. Jamal Crawford vs. Tyson Chandler Same-era comparison
  8. Jamal Crawford vs. Zach Randolph Same-era comparison
  9. Jamal Crawford vs. Richard Jefferson Same-era comparison
  10. Jamal Crawford vs. Boris Diaw Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Chicago Bulls, New York Knicks, Golden State Warriors, Atlanta Hawks, Portland Trail Blazers, Los Angeles Clippers, Minnesota Timberwolves, Phoenix Suns, and Brooklyn Nets

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
41.0%FG%
Three-point
34.8%3P%
Free throw
86.2%FT%

1,327 career games · 38,994 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Jamal Crawford stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
2019–205.00.03.0-12.82BRK106.050.0%50.0%——-1.4
2018–197.91.33.6-3.01PHO64018.939.7%33.2%84.5%#325-25.6
2017–1810.31.22.3-3.11MIN80020.741.5%33.1%90.3%#317-36.7
2016–1712.31.62.6-3.50LAC82126.341.3%36.0%85.7%#332-64.8
2015–1614.21.82.3-2.04LAC79526.940.4%34.0%90.4%#270-1.6
2014–1515.81.92.5-0.64LAC64426.639.6%32.7%90.1%#18745.8
2013–1418.62.33.2+0.37LAC692430.341.6%36.1%86.6%#11599.0
2012–1316.51.72.5+0.12LAC76029.343.8%37.6%87.1%#12889.8
2011–1213.92.03.2-0.60POR60626.938.4%30.8%92.7%#17942.8
2010–1114.21.73.2-0.89ATL76030.242.1%34.1%85.4%#19447.6
2009–1018.02.53.0+1.86ATL79031.144.9%38.2%85.7%#50178.3
2008–0919.73.04.4-0.96GSW/NYK656538.141.0%36.0%87.2%#18852.8
2007–0820.62.65.0+0.27NYK808039.941.0%35.6%86.4%#114137.9
2006–0717.63.24.4-1.50NYK593637.340.0%32.0%83.8%#21020.9
2005–0614.33.13.8-0.57NYK792732.341.6%34.5%82.6%#14969.0
2004–0517.72.94.3+0.24NYK706738.439.8%36.1%84.3%#126113.5
2003–0417.33.55.1+2.18CHI807335.138.6%31.7%83.3%#51225.9
2002–0310.72.34.2+0.26CHI803124.941.3%35.5%80.6%#10087.6
2001–029.31.52.4+1.52CHI23620.947.6%44.8%76.9%#6631.9
2000–014.61.52.3-2.64CHI61817.235.2%35.0%79.4%#249-12.5
Career14.62.23.4—ATL/BRK/CHI/GSW/LAC/MIN/NYK/PHO/POR1327—29.441.0%34.8%86.2%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#762

76.2 average league finish

Career Value Rank#418

1,100 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Jamal Crawford ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score72.3

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
345.0
Qualified seasons
19
All-time rank
#703
Strongest seasons

Every season

Jamal Crawford advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
2019–20Historical Defense EstimateBRK3916-12.82——-1.4—Limited
2018–19Historical Defense EstimatePHO38641,211-3.0112.0#325-25.610thBroad
2017–18Historical Defense EstimateMIN37801,653-3.1112.5#317-36.79thBroad
2016–17Historical Defense EstimateLAC36822,157-3.508.8#332-64.82ndBroad
2015–16Historical Defense EstimateLAC35792,126-2.0425.9#270-1.625thBroad
2014–15Historical Defense EstimateLAC34641,703-0.6449.7#18745.855thBroad
2013–14Historical Defense EstimateLAC33692,094+0.3767.0#11599.073rdBroad
2012–13Historical Defense EstimateLAC32762,230+0.1263.7#12889.870thBroad
2011–12Historical Defense EstimatePOR31601,613-0.6048.1#17942.855thBroad
2010–11Historical Defense EstimateATL30762,297-0.8945.0#19447.655thBroad
2009–10Historical Defense EstimateATL29792,460+1.8685.4#50178.388thBroad
2008–09Historical Defense EstimateGSW/NYK28652,479-0.9643.8#18852.854thBroad
2007–08Historical Defense EstimateNYK27803,190+0.2765.9#114137.979thBroad
2006–07Historical Defense EstimateNYK26592,198-1.5037.4#21020.942ndBroad
2005–06Historical Defense EstimateNYK25792,555-0.5754.9#14969.066thBroad
2004–05Historical Defense EstimateNYK24702,688+0.2463.6#126113.576thBroad
2003–04Historical Defense EstimateCHI23802,811+2.1884.9#51225.990thBroad
2002–03Historical Defense EstimateCHI22801,992+0.2668.9#10087.670thBroad
2001–02Historical Defense EstimateCHI2123481+1.5279.9#6631.950thStandard
2000–01Historical Defense EstimateCHI20611,050-2.6424.2#249-12.524thBroad

Career movement

Jamal Crawford's box impact by season

Peak box impact +2.18 points per 100 possessions in 2003–04 · 20 seasons · 38,994 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Jamal CrawfordEric Gordon
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Jamal Crawford and Eric Gordon era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonJamal CrawfordEric Gordon
1-2.60.8
21.5-0.2
30.32.0
42.20.9
50.2-1.7
6-0.6-0.8
7-1.5-1.4
80.3-0.7
9-1.0-1.3
101.9-1.0
11-0.9-2.8
12-0.6-4.3
130.1-0.2
140.4-1.6
15-0.6-1.2
16-2.0-1.9
17-3.5-0.9
18-3.1-7.1
19-3.0Did not play
20-12.8Did not play

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Jamal Crawford

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →