Best league finish
Menu
Player profile · ATL / DAL / MEM / NJN / ORL / PHO / SAC / TOR

Vince Carter
Vince Carter stats, teams and career impact
#41 all-timeCareer averages · 16.7 PPG · 4.3 RPG · 3.1 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded
- Position
- Shooting guard
- Final NBA team
- Atlanta Hawks
- Height / weight
- 6 ft 6 in (198 cm) · 220 lb (100 kg)
- Born
- January 26, 1977 (49 yrs old)
- College
- UNC
- NBA seasons
- 22 seasons · 1998–99 to 2019–20
Career summaryVince Carter was a shooting guard who played 22 NBA seasons, from 1998–99 through 2019–20.
- Career PPG
- 16.7
- Career RPG
- 4.3
- Career APG
- 3.1
- #1 in 2000–01
- #41 all-time
Career overview
Why Vince Carter ranks #41 all time
Vince Carter ranks #41 all time. He reached #1 once and produced 3 top-five finishes, anchoring a strong peak. His #32 full-career value adds a meaningful longevity advantage.
3 top-five · 5 top-ten finishes
1,541 games · Career Value Rank #32
NBA honors8× All-Star · 2× All-NBA · ROYContext only; honors are not model inputs.
Head to head
Compare Vince Carter with…
Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.
- Vince Carter vs. Kyle Lowry Toronto franchise leaders with different roles
- Vince Carter vs. Dwyane Wade Scoring wings
- Vince Carter vs. Tracy McGrady Scoring wings
- Vince Carter vs. Allen Iverson Scoring wings
- Vince Carter vs. Clyde Drexler Scoring wings
- Vince Carter vs. Kobe Bryant Similar career path
- Vince Carter vs. Dirk Nowitzki Similar career path
- Vince Carter vs. Paul Pierce Similar career path
- Vince Carter vs. Jason Kidd Similar career path
- Vince Carter vs. Scottie Pippen Similar career path
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources
Full team history
- Teams
- Toronto Raptors, New Jersey Nets, Orlando Magic, Phoenix Suns, Dallas Mavericks, Memphis Grizzlies, Sacramento Kings, and Atlanta Hawks
Career shooting
NBA regular season- Field goal
- 43.5%FG%
- Three-point
- 37.1%3P%
- Free throw
- 79.8%FT%
1,541 career games · 46,367 minutes
Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.
Traditional box score
Vince Carter stats by season
Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.
Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.
Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →
| pts/100 · higher is better | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019–20 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 | -3.59 | ATL | 60 | 0 | 14.6 | 35.2% | 30.2% | 79.3% | #323 | -29.9 |
| 2018–19 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 1.1 | -0.46 | ATL | 76 | 9 | 17.5 | 41.9% | 38.9% | 71.2% | #170 | 44.3 |
| 2017–18 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 1.2 | -0.05 | SAC | 58 | 4 | 17.7 | 40.3% | 34.5% | 75.7% | #151 | 39.5 |
| 2016–17 | 8.0 | 3.1 | 1.8 | +0.56 | MEM | 73 | 15 | 24.6 | 39.4% | 37.8% | 76.5% | #105 | 88.7 |
| 2015–16 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 0.9 | +0.11 | MEM | 60 | 3 | 16.8 | 38.8% | 34.9% | 83.3% | #130 | 41.3 |
| 2014–15 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 1.2 | -1.66 | MEM | 66 | 1 | 16.5 | 33.3% | 29.7% | 78.9% | #260 | 7.1 |
| 2013–14 | 11.9 | 3.5 | 2.6 | +1.04 | DAL | 81 | 0 | 24.4 | 40.7% | 39.4% | 82.1% | #72 | 116.7 |
| 2012–13 | 13.4 | 4.1 | 2.4 | +2.85 | DAL | 81 | 3 | 25.8 | 43.5% | 40.6% | 81.6% | #36 | 199.2 |
| 2011–12 | 10.1 | 3.4 | 2.3 | +0.58 | DAL | 61 | 40 | 25.3 | 41.1% | 36.1% | 82.6% | #124 | 75.7 |
| 2010–11 | 14.0 | 3.8 | 2.0 | -0.35 | ORL/PHO | 73 | 63 | 28.1 | 43.7% | 36.1% | 74.0% | #160 | 66.0 |
| 2009–10 | 16.6 | 3.9 | 3.1 | +0.45 | ORL | 75 | 74 | 30.8 | 42.8% | 36.7% | 84.0% | #103 | 108.5 |
| 2008–09 | 20.8 | 5.1 | 4.7 | +3.11 | NJN | 80 | 80 | 36.8 | 43.7% | 38.5% | 81.7% | #23 | 281.9 |
| 2007–08 | 21.3 | 6.0 | 5.1 | +3.50 | NJN | 76 | 72 | 38.9 | 45.6% | 35.9% | 81.6% | #24 | 310.2 |
| 2006–07 | 25.2 | 6.0 | 4.8 | +4.82 | NJN | 82 | 82 | 38.1 | 45.4% | 35.7% | 80.2% | #15 | 406.1 |
| 2005–06 | 24.2 | 5.8 | 4.3 | +5.89 | NJN | 79 | 79 | 36.8 | 43.0% | 34.1% | 79.9% | #13 | 428.8 |
| 2004–05 | 24.5 | 5.2 | 4.2 | +6.79 | NJN/TOR | 77 | 76 | 36.7 | 45.2% | 40.6% | 79.8% | #5 | 465.2 |
| 2003–04 | 22.5 | 4.8 | 4.8 | +4.85 | TOR | 73 | 73 | 38.2 | 41.7% | 38.3% | 80.6% | #8 | 345.1 |
| 2002–03 | 20.6 | 4.4 | 3.3 | +5.45 | TOR | 43 | 42 | 34.2 | 46.7% | 34.4% | 80.6% | #12 | 205.3 |
| 2001–02 | 24.7 | 5.2 | 4.0 | +5.44 | TOR | 60 | 60 | 39.8 | 42.8% | 38.7% | 79.8% | #7 | 328.5 |
| 2000–01 | 27.6 | 5.5 | 3.9 | +8.26 | TOR | 75 | 75 | 39.7 | 46.0% | 40.8% | 76.5% | #1 | 578.8 |
| 1999–00 | 25.7 | 5.8 | 3.9 | +6.59 | TOR | 82 | 82 | 38.1 | 46.5% | 40.3% | 79.1% | #5 | 517.6 |
| 1998–99 | 18.3 | 5.7 | 3.0 | +3.54 | TOR | 50 | 49 | 35.2 | 45.0% | 28.8% | 76.1% | #25 | 180.5 |
| Career | 16.7 | 4.3 | 3.1 | — | ATL/DAL/MEM/NJN/ORL/PHO/SAC/TOR | 1541 | — | 30.1 | 43.5% | 37.1% | 79.8% | — | — |
Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.
Film evidence
Vince Carter highlights
Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.
Vince Carter's best play from every season
One play from every season gives Carter's page the right visual frame: explosive early athleticism followed by an unusually long, adaptable career.
What these measures mean
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
- Impact Rate
- A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
- Impact estimate
- The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
- Impact Rate rank
- The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
- Value contribution / Season Value
- Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
- Career Impact Rank
- An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
5.7 composite · lower is better
5.2 average league finish
4,805 total value
- Impact Rate
- 0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
- Box impact
- Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.
Career standing
How Vince Carter ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons
Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.
- Best 3 effective weight
- 74%
- Missing-season finish
- 341.5
- Qualified seasons
- 22
- All-time rank
- #41
Every season
Vince Carter advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
Scroll for more columns
| pts/100 · higher is better | 0–100 · higher is better | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 43 | 60 | 876 | -3.59 | 8.5 | #323 | -29.9 | 9th | Standard |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 42 | 76 | 1,330 | -0.46 | 54.1 | #170 | 44.3 | 56th | Broad |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | SAC | 41 | 58 | 1,026 | -0.05 | 58.4 | #151 | 39.5 | 48th | Broad |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 40 | 73 | 1,799 | +0.56 | 71.3 | #105 | 88.7 | 74th | Broad |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 39 | 60 | 1,005 | +0.11 | 64.5 | #130 | 41.3 | 52nd | Broad |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | MEM | 38 | 66 | 1,091 | -1.66 | 30.0 | #260 | 7.1 | 29th | Broad |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 37 | 81 | 1,973 | +1.04 | 79.4 | #72 | 116.7 | 77th | Broad |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 36 | 81 | 2,093 | +2.85 | 90.0 | #36 | 199.2 | 89th | Broad |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | DAL | 35 | 61 | 1,542 | +0.58 | 64.1 | #124 | 75.7 | 69th | Broad |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | ORL/PHO | 34 | 73 | 2,051 | -0.35 | 54.7 | #160 | 66.0 | 62nd | Broad |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | ORL | 33 | 75 | 2,310 | +0.45 | 69.6 | #103 | 108.5 | 75th | Broad |
| 2008–09Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 32 | 80 | 2,946 | +3.11 | 93.4 | #23 | 281.9 | 96th | Broad |
| 2007–08Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 31 | 76 | 2,959 | +3.50 | 93.1 | #24 | 310.2 | 96th | Broad |
| 2006–07Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 30 | 82 | 3,126 | +4.82 | 95.8 | #15 | 406.1 | 98th | Broad |
| 2005–06Historical Defense Estimate | NJN | 29 | 79 | 2,906 | +5.89 | 96.3 | #13 | 428.8 | 97th | Broad |
| 2004–05Historical Defense Estimate | NJN/TOR | 28 | 77 | 2,828 | +6.79 | 98.8 | #5 | 465.2 | 99th | Broad |
| 2003–04Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 27 | 73 | 2,785 | +4.85 | 97.9 | #8 | 345.1 | 98th | Broad |
| 2002–03Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 26 | 43 | 1,471 | +5.45 | 96.5 | #12 | 205.3 | 88th | Broad |
| 2001–02Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 25 | 60 | 2,385 | +5.44 | 98.1 | #7 | 328.5 | 94th | Broad |
| 2000–01Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 24 | 75 | 2,979 | +8.26 | 100.0 | #1 | 578.8 | 100th | Broad |
| 1999–00Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 23 | 82 | 3,126 | +6.59 | 98.8 | #5 | 517.6 | 99th | Broad |
| 1998–99Historical Defense Estimate | TOR | 22 | 50 | 1,760 | +3.54 | 91.3 | #25 | 180.5 | 94th | Broad |
Career movement
Vince Carter's box impact by season
Peak box impact +8.26 points per 100 possessions in 2000–01 · 22 seasons · 46,367 minutes
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
| NBA season | Vince Carter | Kobe Bryant |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | 6.6 | 0.5 |
| 3 | 8.3 | 1.2 |
| 4 | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| 5 | 5.5 | 4.5 |
| 6 | 4.9 | 4.3 |
| 7 | 6.8 | 7.4 |
| 8 | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| 9 | 4.8 | 5.0 |
| 10 | 3.5 | 8.0 |
| 11 | 3.1 | 5.9 |
| 12 | 0.4 | 5.2 |
| 13 | -0.3 | 5.8 |
| 14 | 0.6 | 4.2 |
| 15 | 2.9 | 5.1 |
| 16 | 1.0 | 3.2 |
| 17 | -1.7 | 4.1 |
| 18 | 0.1 | -6.2 |
| 19 | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 20 | -0.1 | -0.3 |
| 21 | -0.5 | Did not play |
| 22 | -3.6 | Did not play |
NBA season number
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Vince Carter
The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.
Kobe Bryant
86career similarity score
90/100 closest-season score · 2000–01 ↔ 2002–03PF · All-Time Career #42Dirk Nowitzki
86career similarity score
89/100 closest-season score · 2000–01 ↔ 2002–03SF · All-Time Career #55Paul Pierce
85career similarity score
89/100 closest-season score · 2000–01 ↔ 2001–02Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →