hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

Player profile · CHI / HOU / IND / LAL / NYK / SAC

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Metta World Peace

Metta World Peace

Metta World Peace stats, teams and career impact

#248 all-timeCareer averages · 13.2 PPG · 4.5 RPG · 2.7 APGPeak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Position
Small forward
Final NBA team
Los Angeles Lakers
Height / weight
6 ft 7 in (201 cm) · 260 lb (118 kg)
Born
November 13, 1979 (46 yrs old)
College
St. John's
NBA seasons
17 seasons · 1999–00 to 2016–17

Career summaryMetta World Peace was a small forward who played 17 NBA seasons, from 1999–00 through 2016–17.

Career PPG
13.2
Career RPG
4.5
Career APG
2.7
Best-Season Impact Rank
#22 in 2003–04
Career Impact Rank
#248 all-time
Peak-weighted regular-season model · playoffs, awards, and championships excluded

Career overview

Why Metta World Peace ranks #248 all time

Metta World Peace ranks #248 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #25.7. His full-career value ranks #168, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high.

Peak#22 in 2003–04

Best league finish

Sustained excellence14 ranked seasons

450+ minutes required per season

Career breadth17 seasons

991 games · Career Value Rank #168

NBA honorsAll-Star · All-NBA · 4× All-Defense · DPOYContext only; honors are not model inputs.

Head to head

Compare Metta World Peace with…

Choose any two players →

Suggested matchups from basketball rivalries, comparable roles, and similar careers. Compare career impact, peak seasons, and the numbers behind the result.

  1. Metta World Peace vs. Nicolas Batum Similar career path
  2. Metta World Peace vs. Jason Terry Similar career path
  3. Metta World Peace vs. Horace Grant Similar career path
  4. Metta World Peace vs. Elvin Hayes Similar career path
  5. Metta World Peace vs. LaMarcus Aldridge Similar career path
  6. Metta World Peace vs. Robert Horry Similar career path
  7. Metta World Peace vs. Andre Miller Same-era comparison
  8. Metta World Peace vs. Tony Parker Same-era comparison
  9. Metta World Peace vs. Gerald Wallace Same-era comparison
  10. Metta World Peace vs. Elton Brand Same-era comparison
Suggested comparisons, not a ranking of search traffic.
Full player detailsTeam history, career shooting and sources

Full team history

Teams
Chicago Bulls, Indiana Pacers, Sacramento Kings, Houston Rockets, Los Angeles Lakers, and New York Knicks

Career shooting

NBA regular season
Field goal
41.4%FG%
Three-point
33.9%3P%
Free throw
71.5%FT%

991 career games · 31,440 minutes

Sources and updateConventional stats and measurements: Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 13, 2026. hussEyquation ranking data through 2025–26. Life dates: Wikidata; conflicting dates checked against Basketball Reference, accessed Sep 17, 2026.

Traditional box score

Metta World Peace stats by season

Start with scoring and impact, then switch views for shooting or the full advanced picture. Career percentages use total makes and attempts.

Box impact is an estimate in points per 100 possessions, not the 0–100 Impact Rate score. Zero is league average; higher is better. Rate rank is a league place: No. 1 is best.

Swipe for PPG · RPG · APG · Box impact · Team · G · GS · MPG →

pts/100 · higher is better
2016–172.30.80.4-7.75LAL2526.427.9%23.7%62.5%—-18.9
2015–165.02.50.8-2.56LAL35516.931.1%31.0%70.2%#297-6.6
2013–144.82.00.6-1.57NYK29113.439.7%31.5%62.5%—3.1
2012–1312.45.01.5-0.08LAL756633.740.3%34.2%73.4%#14095.4
2011–127.73.42.2-0.57LAL644526.939.4%29.6%61.7%#17546.3
2010–118.53.32.1+0.22LAL828229.439.7%35.6%67.6%#126100.9
2009–1011.04.33.0+0.44LAL777733.841.4%35.5%68.8%#106122.7
2008–0917.15.23.3+1.69HOU695535.540.1%39.9%74.8%#52170.2
2007–0820.55.83.5+2.22SAC575438.145.3%38.0%71.9%#44180.6
2006–0718.86.53.4+3.29SAC706537.744.0%35.8%74.0%#29276.0
2005–0617.65.13.6+1.48IND/SAC565639.440.4%30.8%67.5%#57145.9
2004–0524.66.43.1+3.66IND7741.649.6%41.2%92.2%—29.9
2003–0418.35.33.7+3.29IND737137.242.1%31.0%73.3%#22261.9
2002–0315.55.22.9+3.47IND696733.642.8%33.6%73.6%#26241.9
2001–0213.24.92.3+2.75CHI/IND555029.942.3%31.2%66.7%#33148.0
2000–0111.93.93.0+0.74CHI767431.140.1%29.1%75.0%#83120.5
1999–0012.04.32.8+1.36CHI726331.140.7%31.4%67.4%#68140.1
Career13.24.52.7—CHI/HOU/IND/LAL/NYK/SAC991—31.741.4%33.9%71.5%——

Source: Basketball Reference regular-season totals, accessed Sep 13, 2026.

Film evidence

Metta World Peace highlights

Watch the selected footage or film analysis, then use the season record and impact data to put what happened on the floor in context.

Defensive retrospective

Ron Artest defensive highlights

Metta World Peace's defensive retrospective adds visual context to the numbers on this page, especially his ball pressure, strength and disruptive work against elite scorers. The vetted footage complements the season tables and impact model.

What these measures mean
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average, from the historical box-score model. Zero is league average; higher is better. Historical defense estimates are included where labeled. This is not the live model's lineup-adjusted estimate.
Impact Rate
A 0–100 score comparing performance within one season. Higher is better. This is a score, not points per possession.
Impact estimate
The season model's final estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, before conversion to the 0–100 Impact Rate score. It includes lineup evidence where available. Zero is league average; higher is better.
Impact Rate rank
The player's place among qualified players in that season's Impact Rate ranking. No. 1 is best. This is a rank, not an impact score.
Value contribution / Season Value
Completed seasons use a fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. The live season instead uses Season Value, combining that season's impact with workload.
Career Impact Rank
An all-time rank weighted toward the player's best three, five, and ten seasons.
Best 5#264

30.8 average league finish

Career Value Rank#168

2,058 total value

Impact Rate
0–100 score within one season. Higher is better.
Box impact
Estimated points per 100 possessions above league average, from the historical model. Zero is average; higher is better.

Career standing

How Metta World Peace ranks all time

These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.

Number-one seasons0

Best in the league

Top-five seasons0

Elite finishes

Top-ten seasons0

Upper-tier finishes

Top-10 Impact Margin0.0

Tie-breaker across top-ten seasons

Career Composite Score32.5

Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes receive 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights. Missing seasons receive a replacement finish just below the player's typical qualified field. Lower is better.

Best 3 effective weight
74%
Missing-season finish
334.0
Qualified seasons
14
All-time rank
#248
Strongest seasons

Every season

Metta World Peace advanced stats by season

Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.

More advanced statsAge, minutes, impact, rank, value and data coverage
pts/100 · higher is better0–100 · higher is better
2016–17Historical Defense EstimateLAL3725160-7.75——-18.9—Limited
2015–16Historical Defense EstimateLAL3635590-2.5618.5#297-6.621stStandard
2013–14Historical Defense EstimateNYK3429388-1.57——3.1—Limited
2012–13Historical Defense EstimateLAL33752,530-0.0860.3#14095.471stBroad
2011–12Historical Defense EstimateLAL32641,720-0.5749.3#17546.356thBroad
2010–11Historical Defense EstimateLAL31822,410+0.2264.4#126100.972ndBroad
2009–10Historical Defense EstimateLAL30772,605+0.4468.8#106122.779thBroad
2008–09Historical Defense EstimateHOU29692,452+1.6984.7#52170.287thBroad
2007–08Historical Defense EstimateSAC28572,172+2.2287.0#44180.683rdBroad
2006–07Historical Defense EstimateSAC27702,641+3.2991.6#29276.093rdBroad
2005–06Historical Defense EstimateIND/SAC26562,207+1.4882.9#57145.980thBroad
2004–05Historical Defense EstimateIND257291+3.66——29.9—Limited
2003–04Historical Defense EstimateIND24732,714+3.2993.7#22261.993rdBroad
2002–03Historical Defense EstimateIND23692,317+3.4792.1#26241.991stBroad
2001–02Historical Defense EstimateCHI/IND22551,642+2.7590.1#33148.082ndBroad
2000–01Historical Defense EstimateCHI21762,363+0.7474.9#83120.576thBroad
1999–00Historical Defense EstimateCHI20722,238+1.3679.1#68140.181stBroad

Career movement

Metta World Peace's box impact by season

Peak box impact +3.66 points per 100 possessions in 2004–05 · 17 seasons · 31,440 minutes

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Rank labels show Impact Rate league places, not ranks on this chart's box-impact scale.

Box impact · points per 100 possessionsMinutes
—’15
Player-specific impact scaleWorkload

Career comparison

Compare the shape, not the calendar

Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.

Open full comparison →
Metta World PeaceNicolas Batum
Box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better · dashed marker means the player did not play
Metta World Peace and Nicolas Batum era-centered impact values by NBA season number
NBA seasonMetta World PeaceNicolas Batum
11.40.8
20.73.4
32.71.3
43.52.4
53.32.5
63.72.4
71.51.1
83.31.6
92.21.8
101.70.7
110.4-0.1
120.2-0.6
13-0.61.1
14-0.12.1
15-1.60.3
16-2.6-0.0
17-7.7-0.0
18Did not play-1.5

NBA season number

Similar career arcs

Players with careers similar to Metta World Peace

The career-similarity score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and experience-aligned trajectory. It describes career shape, not playing style, equal ability, or probability.

How to read this page

Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played; completed player-profile rows instead show each season's fixed-baseline contribution to Career Value. Career Impact Rank rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →